Page 803 - RAQAMLI TRANSFORMATSIYA DAVRIDA PEDAGOGIK TA’LIMNI RIVOJLANTIRISH ISTIQBOLLARI
P. 803
3. Increased Engagement: Participation rates in debates and discussions rose
from 40% to 85%. Students made an effort to support their opinions with specific
examples from the text.
4. Diagnostic Test Results: In the pre-experiment test, only 35% of students
could express a complex, analytically based opinion about a given literary excerpt.
After the experiment, this indicator improved to 80%.
The results indicate that fostering critical thinking requires methods that are
more active and student-centered compared to the traditional lesson system.
Methods like the double-entry journal provide students with the opportunity to
systematically record and develop their thoughts. The “What If?” strategy develops
hypothetical thinking, encouraging consideration of alternative approaches to
analyzing a text.
The process of discussion and exchange of ideas teaches students not only to
strengthen their own opinions but also to understand and respect other points of
view. This contributes to the development of not only literary but also essential life
competencies.
Research Limitations: The study was conducted within a single class of one
school. Broader studies encompassing different regions and schools are required to
generalize the results more widely.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, it can be emphasized that developing literary critical thinking is
a crucial step not only for a deeper mastery of literature but also for shaping students
into independent, responsible, and active members of a democratic society. The
methods proposed in this article – the double-entry journal, the “What If?” strategy,
structured debates, and others – are effective tools for this path. The regular and
systematic application of these methods can prepare students not only for literature
exams but also for analyzing complex life situations.
REFERENCES
1. Abida, F. I. N. (2016). Critical thinking skills to literary works: A method of
teaching language through literature. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society),
1(1), v1i1-148.
2. Bayzakov, T., Yusupov, S., Yunusov, R., Xolmirzaev, I., Esanov, J., &
Kulmamatova, S. (2023, August). Modeling the process of growing seeds of
vegetable crops with ultraviolet light. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science (Vol. 1231, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing.
3. Black, M. (2018). Critical thinking: An introduction to logic and scientific
method. Pickle Partners Publishing.
4. Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2020). Critical thinking: Learn the tools the best thinkers
use. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
5. Khakimov, B. B., Rajabov, N. Q., Sharipov, Z. S., Kalandarova, S. T.,
G’aniboyeva, E. M., & Kulmamatov, O. A. (2021, October). Analysis of methods of
forming diesel and bioethanol fuel mixture. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science (Vol. 868, No. 1, p. 012022). IOP Publishing.
6. Kulmamatov, O. (2024). INGLIZ TILINI SAMARALI O ‘RGATISHDA TINGLAB 801
TUSHUNISHNING MUHIM JIHATLARI. Nordic_Press, 3(0003).
V SHO‘BA:
Til va adabiyot ta’limida dolzarb muammolar va yechimlar
https://www.asr-conference.com/

