Page 22 - DP Vol 21 No1_Neat
P. 22

PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY SECTION



           QUADRANT WISE FULL MOUTH REHABILITATION AND FOLLOW-UP
           Maxillary Right Quadrant












           Fig 9: 54 – Carious lesion – Distal          Fig 10: 54 – After excavation of carious lesion   Fig 11: 54, 55 - Photograph taken
           55 – Mesial Marginal Ridge – appears frosty –   55 – Mesial Marginal Ridge involved.  from Mesial aspect to reveal the
           demineralized – Incipient decay.                                                 excavated carious lesion of 55 –
                                                                                            Mesial.













           Fig 12: 55 – Restored with Nano-cluster   Fig 13: 54 – Restored with Nano-cluster Paste form   Fig 14: 54, 55 – Four and half months after
           Paste form Composites.           Composites.                            restorations with Nano-Cluster Paste Form
                                                                                   Composites.

           Maxillary Left Quadrant











           Fig 15: 64, 65 – Proximal Carious   Fig 16: 64 – Distal Carious   Fig 17: 64 – (Disto - Occlusal)   Fig 18: 64, 65 – after Four and
           Lesions – Pre-treatment.     lesion excavated and enamel   Restored with Nano Cluster Flowable   half months- Post Restoration.
                                        cavosurface modified.    Composites – Incrementally layered.  The Nano Cluster Flowable
                                        - 65 – Mesial Carious Lesion   65 – (Mesio- Occlusal) Restored with   Composite on 64 is as good as
                                        excavated and enamel     Nano Cluster Paste Form Composites –  the Nano-Cluster Paste form
                                        cavosurface modified.    Incrementally layered.         Composite restoration on 65.
                                                                 Clinically: Restoring with Nano-
                                                                 Cluster Flowable took lesser time as
                                                                 compared to Nano- Cluster Paste Form
                                                                 Composite.

              Rationale for using Nano–Cluster - Flowable over Paste Form:

              - Flowable due to its lesser viscosity and, higher flowability and consequent wettability tend to adapt to the tooth
              structure better whereas paste form composites have to be adapted to the tooth surface.
                                                                                  9
              - Flowables though having lower filler content (65% by weight; 46% by volume)  as compared to Paste Form
              Composites (72% by weight; 55.6% by volume)  have slightly lower strength but, the filler content has almost neared
                                                      9
              that of the paste form composites due to the Nano–Cluster effect, which allows more loading of the fillers. Earlier,
              the flowable composites had even lower filler content. The Nano-Cluster therefore allows greater filler content in
              Flowables.


           22 Dental Practice I January-February 2025 I Vol 21 No 1
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27