Page 97 - AREA VI- PARAMETER B (PLANNING, IMPLEMENTTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION)
P. 97
In terms of the beneficiaries’ evaluation on the Training Resource Speakers, indicators,
“clarity of presentation”, “facilitation to learning” and “initiative to sustain interest in the topic” gained
a weighted mean of 5.00 with a description of “outstanding”. Also, indicators, “mastery of the subject
matter” and “reasonableness of the duration of the presentation” gained an “outstanding” rating from
the beneficiaries with a 4.90 as a weighted mean.
With a grand mean of 4.96, resource speakers were outstanding based on the evaluation of
the beneficiaries of the program.
Table 3. Evaluation on Training Coordinator/Secretariat
Training Coordinator/Secretariat Weighted Mean Descriptive Equivalent
1. Facilitation 4.90 Outstanding
2. Ability to respond to the needs Outstanding
of the participants 5.00
3. Time Management Outstanding
4.80
GRAND 4.90 Outstanding
MEAN
Presented in table 3 the beneficiaries’ evaluation on training coordinator/secretariat. Based
on the evaluation, the training coordinator/secretariat is outstanding with the gained grand mean of
4.90.
Specifically, the indicator, “ability to respond to the needs of the participants” gained the
highest weighted mean of 5.00, followed by “facilitation” with 4.90 and “time management” with 4.80,
all with a descriptive equivalent of “outstanding”.
Table 4. Evaluation on Food/Accommodation/Venue
Food Accommodation/Venue Weighted Mean Descriptive Equivalent
1. Food 5.00 Outstanding
2. Accommodation Outstanding
5.00
3. Venue of the Training Outstanding
5.00
GRAND 5.00 Outstanding
MEAN
As to beneficiaries’ evaluation of food/accommodation/venue, this gained a
5.00 grand mean with a descriptive equivalent of “outstanding”. Based on the table, all
indicators, “food’, “accommodation”, and “venue of the training”, gained an
outstanding rating with a weighted mean of 5.00.
Table 5. Overall assessment of the Training
Over-all Assessment of the training Weighted Mean Descriptive
Equivalent
1. Attainment of the training Outstanding
2
objectives 5.00
2. Responsiveness of the training Outstanding
objectives 4.90
INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONAND
GOVERNANCE