Page 97 - AREA VI- PARAMETER B (PLANNING, IMPLEMENTTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION)
P. 97

In terms of the beneficiaries’ evaluation on the Training Resource Speakers, indicators,
              “clarity of presentation”, “facilitation to learning” and “initiative to sustain interest in the topic” gained
              a weighted mean of 5.00 with a description of “outstanding”. Also, indicators, “mastery of the subject
              matter” and “reasonableness of the duration of the presentation” gained an “outstanding” rating from
              the beneficiaries with a 4.90 as a weighted mean.
                    With a grand mean of 4.96, resource speakers were outstanding based on the evaluation of
              the beneficiaries of the program.

                    Table 3. Evaluation on Training Coordinator/Secretariat



                 Training Coordinator/Secretariat    Weighted Mean       Descriptive Equivalent
                   1. Facilitation                        4.90                Outstanding
                   2. Ability to respond to the needs                         Outstanding
                      of the participants                 5.00
                   3. Time Management                                         Outstanding
                                                          4.80
                                     GRAND                4.90                Outstanding
                                     MEAN
                     Presented in table 3 the beneficiaries’ evaluation on training coordinator/secretariat. Based
              on the evaluation, the training coordinator/secretariat is outstanding with the gained grand mean of
              4.90.
                     Specifically, the indicator, “ability to respond to the needs of the participants” gained the
              highest weighted mean of 5.00, followed by “facilitation” with 4.90 and “time management” with 4.80,
              all with a descriptive equivalent of “outstanding”.

                     Table 4. Evaluation on Food/Accommodation/Venue


                  Food Accommodation/Venue           Weighted Mean       Descriptive Equivalent
                   1. Food                                5.00                Outstanding
                   2. Accommodation                                           Outstanding
                                                          5.00
                   3. Venue of the Training                                   Outstanding
                                                          5.00
                                     GRAND                5.00                Outstanding
                                     MEAN

                    As to beneficiaries’ evaluation of food/accommodation/venue, this gained a
                    5.00 grand mean with a descriptive equivalent of “outstanding”. Based on the table, all
                    indicators, “food’, “accommodation”, and “venue of the training”, gained an
                    outstanding rating with a weighted mean of 5.00.

                    Table 5. Overall assessment of the Training

                Over-all Assessment of the training   Weighted Mean           Descriptive
                                                                              Equivalent
                   1. Attainment of the training                              Outstanding
                                                                                      2
                      objectives                           5.00
                   2. Responsiveness of the training                          Outstanding
                      objectives                           4.90

               INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONAND
               GOVERNANCE
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102