Page 791 - Krugmans Economics for AP Text Book_Neat
P. 791

fyi



             Voting as a Public Good
             It’s a sad fact that many Americans who are eli-  no! The reason is that it is very unlikely that
             gible to vote don’t bother to. As a result, their in-  your vote will decide the issue, either way. If the
             terests tend to be ignored by politicians. But  measure passes, you benefit, even if you didn’t
             what’s even sadder is that this self-defeating  bother to vote—the benefits are nonexcludable.
             behavior may be completely rational.  If the measure doesn’t pass, your vote would
               As the economist Mancur Olson pointed out  not have changed the outcome. Either way, by
             in a famous book titled The Logic of Collective  not voting—by free-riding on those who do     iStockphoto
             Action, voting is a public good, one that suffers  vote—you save $10.
             from severe free-rider problems.    Of course, many people do vote out of a
               Imagine that you are one of a million people  sense of civic duty. But because political   nored. Conversely, small, well-organized inter-
             who would stand to gain the equivalent of $100  action is a public good, in general people   est groups that act on issues narrowly tar-
             each if some plan is passed in a statewide   devote too little effort to defending their own  geted in their favor tend to have
             referendum—say, a plan to improve public  interests.                 disproportionate power.
             schools. And suppose that the opportunity cost  The result, Olson pointed out, is that when  Is this a reason to distrust democracy? Win-
             of the time it would take you to vote is $10. Will  a large group of people share a common polit-  ston Churchill said it best: “Democracy is the
             you be sure to go to the polls and vote for the  ical interest, they are likely to exert too little  worst form of government, except for all the
             referendum? If you are rational, the answer is  effort promoting their cause and so will be ig-  other forms that have been tried.”




             Common Resources

             A common resource is a good that is nonexcludable but is rival in consumption. An
             example is the stock of fish in a fishing area, like the fisheries off the coast of New Eng-
             land. Traditionally, anyone who had a boat could go out to sea and catch fish—fish in
             the sea were a nonexcludable good. Yet the total number of fish is limited: the fish that
             one person catches are no longer available to be caught by someone else. So fish in the
             sea are rival in consumption.
               Other examples of common resources include clean air, water, and the diversity of
             animal and plant species on the planet (biodiversity). In each of these cases the fact that
             the good is rival in consumption, and yet nonexcludable, poses a serious problem.


             The Problem of Overuse
             Because common resources are nonexcludable, individuals cannot be charged for their
             use. But the resources are rival in consumption, so an individual who uses a unit de-
             pletes the resource by making that unit unavailable to others. As a result, a common re-
             source is subject to  overuse: an individual will continue to use it until his or her
             marginal private benefit is equal to his or her marginal private cost, ignoring the cost
             that this action inflicts on society as a whole.
               Fish are a classic example of a common resource. Particularly in heavily fished wa-
                                                                                         A common resource is nonexcludable
             ters, my fishing imposes a cost on others by reducing the fish population and making
                                                                                         and rival in consumption: you can’t stop me
             it harder for others to catch fish. But I have no personal incentive to take this cost into  from consuming the good, and more
             account, since I cannot be charged for fishing. As a result, from society’s point of view,  consumption by me means less of the good
             I catch too many fish. Traffic congestion is another example of overuse of a common  available for you.
             resource. A major highway during rush hour can accommodate only a certain number  Overuse is the depletion of a common
             of vehicles per hour. If I decide to drive to work alone rather than carpool or work at  resource that occurs when individuals ignore
             home, I cause many other people to have a longer commute; but I have no incentive to  the fact that their use depletes the amount of
             take these consequences into account.                                       the resource remaining for others.



                                                                                module 76      Public Goods     749
   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796