Page 29 - Gallery 19C Nazarenes Catalogues
P. 29

staged in the artificially darkened halls of his studio the products of   Nothing demonstrates Overbeck’s political acumen and missionary
 a disembodied outline-art, an art deprived of color and thus life.     zeal more impressively than his canvas The Triumph of Religion in the
 42
 These arguments leave no doubt that it was in the end not a matter of   Arts (Fig. 19). Commissioned for the Städel in 1829 the composition
 sheer quality but a question of ideology that made Overbeck’s oeuvre   reworked Raphael’s Vatican fresco of the Disputa del sacramento,
 so divisive, an oeuvre in which aesthetics were synonymous with   which, in turn, had taken flight from a then popular motif, the so-
 politics, and politics with faith. Like Hercules at the crossroads, the   called sacra conversazione. This picture type, which gathered figures
 viewer must decide, be for or against. Neutrality was not an option.  from across time in a unified space, appealed to Overbeck not least
 for its freedom from temporal unity, and he proceeded to use this
 Was Overbeck merely, one might wonder, yet another example   freedom to marshal roughly 100 artists from late antiquity to the High
 of the sociable renegade who, having battled an ossified academy   Renaissance, adding a few contemporary witnesses, himself among
 in his youth, diminished to a lonely dogmatist as time went on?   them, to the mix. Raphael had already taken the critical step in this
 Hardly, as a fresh look at his case reveals. Overbeck’s performative   direction, when he replaced the assembly of Saints with a more mottled
 self-representation rather betrays the machinations of a shrewd,   congregation who, while unanimously examples of exceptional faith,
 and quintessentially modern, media politician, who left little in   were no longer all canonized by the Roman Catholic church for their
 43
 his life to coincidence.   In contrast to others, he was not easily   “heroic virtue” as saints. Indeed, the Renaissance master had even
 swayed by prestige or the promise of handsome enumeration. His   added the odd poet, artist and philosopher to the impressive array
 decisions were guided by an artistic masterplan of what it meant   of theologians debating the doctrine of the transubstantiation, of
 to be a religious, indeed, a modern religious painter. Only this   Christ’s presence in the Eucharist. This now gave Overbeck license
 broader missionary vision of art, of his art, explains the remarkable   to forge his own mystical union of painters, sculptors, architects and
 frequency with which Overbeck declined prominent commissions   patrons, whose life and art had been dedicated to glorify Religion.
 or the chairmanship of a major academy. When he did accept an
 assignment, especially a public one, he always did so with a keen   Less a debate than a sermon, The Triumph of Religion in the Arts was all
 44
 eye on an advancement of his influence over the public discourse.    about instruction. Modern art must follow this model of a prescriptive
 Overbeck was, to use modern jargon, a media-savvy influencer.   past, the canvas declared with monumental might, and do so in both
 style and pious resolve. To secure the success of the canvas’s pedagogic
 and ideological labor, the painter programmatically published a lengthy
 explanation of its iconography, which, quickly translated into English,
 45
 also named all of the artists featured.   This decision reflected
 Overbeck’s astute awareness how much the knowledge of art’s symbolic
 language had waned in the modern age. Together, the combination of
 pictorial sermon and verbal explication continued what Overbeck had
 long practiced in his studio, not least in front of the Triumph itself. The
 canvas had occupied a place of pride in his Roman atelier for more than
 a decade, and already in those years exerted a notable, if unrecognized
 power. Its most immediate reflection can be found in Paul Delaroche’s
 murals for the semi-circular lecture theatre of the École des Beaux-
 Arts in Paris, completed in 1841 and soon, as the British Art Journal
 noted in 1856, “almost as well known in England as in France, for it is
 46
 one of the lions of Paris, which no Englishman ever fails to visit.
 There is one more aspect of Overbeck’s secular-sacred conversation
 that is noteworthy.

 Fig. 19


 28
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34