Page 71 - Gallery 19C Nazarenes Catalogues
P. 71

2  7       PROVENANCE                  EXHIBITED                  LITERATURE
 Joseph Anton Koch  Private collection, England   Los Angeles, J. Paul Getty   Lutterotti 1940, no. G 122, 229
 AUSTRIAN, 1768–1839  Private collection    Museum, Zeitgeist: Art from   Lutterotti 1985, no. G 90a, 305, ill.
            Switzerland, 1852
                                                                   no. 66, 186
                                        Germanic World 1800–1900,
 LANDSCAPE WITH APOLLO AMONG THE SHEPHERDS, 1836   Sale, Grisebach, Berlin,    10 February–17 May 2015, no. 327.
 signed with monogram J.K. (lower left on stone)   28 May 2014, lot 109
 oil on canvas  Private Collection, California
 31 ¹/₄ by 47 ¹/₄ in. (79.5 by 120 cm)  (acquired at the above sale)










 1832 was a good year for Joseph Anton Koch (1768–1839). Late that   over and, equally mesmerized, put down their own instruments in a gesture   then and now, sense a powerful element of anti-aesthetic sublimity in   ¹  Reiter 2014, 211
 year he had received a commission for seven historical-mythological   of defeat. The most prominent of them, goat-legged, with horns and a   Koch’s composition: Marsyas emerges as the modern artist’s alter ego, a   ²  Robin Hard. “Apollo, Artemis, and Athena.” In The Routledge Handbook of
 scenes from Hermann Härtel (1803–1875), heir to the important music   rugged face is Pan, as Koch himself suggested in a brief aside to the Danish   potent reminder that his flagrant corporeality, like our entanglement in the   Greek Mythology, ed. Robin Hard. Routledge Handbooks Online (3 Dec 2019).
 publishing house Breitkopf & Härtel in Leipzig. They were intended for   sculptor Bertel Thorvaldsen, who acquired the composition’s first version   material, can no longer be sublimated. This seems a quite apt reading for   ³  Holst 1989, 336.
 Härtel’s “Roman Villa,” a kind of contemporary Villa Farnesina that he   when the paint was hardly dry.   But most have seen in the figure another    Koch’s programmatic juxtaposition of the Apollinian and the Dionysian.   ⁴  https://kataloget.thorvaldsensmuseum.dk/en/B125.
 3
 had constructed in the heart of his hometown between 1832 and 1834.   of Apollo’s unfortunate challenger, the satyr Marsyas, who had taught
 Free to choose his subject matter, Koch picked themes conducive to   himself how to play the traditional aulos, that double flute he had found   Regardless of the staffage’s interpretation, the landscape itself is of   ⁵  Robin Hard. “The Younger Olympian Gods and Goddesses.”
            unalloyed beauty. Koch centered the scenery on La Serpentara, a small
                                                                     In The Routledge Handbook of Greek Mythology, ed. Robin Hard.
 his interest in landscape: Apollo among the Shepherds, The Abduction of Hylas,   discarded by its divine inventor, Athena. Is he, we might wonder, the other   forest of holm oaks above the Italian town of Olevano. The spot, which   Routledge Handbooks Online.
 Diana and Actaeon, Silenus and His Followers, the Death of Orpheus, Nessus’s Rape of   satyr, pointing toward the divine musician on the other side of the brook?    offers an impressive view over the hilly landscape, had been Koch’s
 Deianira, and Chiron Teaching Achilles to Play the Lyre.   Unfortunately, the fresco   Be that as it may, both satyrs stare at the God with undisguised   ⁶  Pan, too, lost, but with much less severe consequences.
 1
 project never progressed beyond its initial stage, and Koch decided to   admiration. Or do they?   artistic discovery, and its picturesque interplay of vegetation, rocks and   ⁷  Holst 1989, 336.
                                                  th
 execute his design in oil instead. In 1833/34, he finished the first version   light would attract poets and artists throughout the 19  century. When   ⁸  www.kunsthalle-karlsruhe.de/kunstreise-um-die-welt-der-pflanzen/
 of Apollo among the Shepherds. It was an immediate success. Peter   The composition has often been interpreted in this way, with Apollo shown   the grove was to be cut down in 1873, it was not surprising indeed that   edmund-friedrich-kanoldt-aus-der-serpentara-bei-olevano/
 Cornelius (1783–1867), one of the most celebrated figureheads of the   as the unquestioned victor of a musical challenge. After all, everyone is   another German artist, Edmund Friedrich Kanoldt (1845–1904), launched   ⁹  Holst 1989, 336-338.
                                                  8
 Nazarene movement and by then director of the influential Munich   looking in his direction, and even we, the viewer, are first drawn to his   a successful fundraising campaign for its preservation.   But Koch himself
 Academy of the Fine Arts, even considered it among Koch’s best works.  presence. “In making music, they both represent art, but the satyr Marsyas   was interested in more than merely depicting some enchanting vedute.
 … represents the instinctive, the wild, the unconventional, whereas Apollo   He played freely with the elements gleaned from his intense studies of
 The scene unites two separate episodes of the Apollo myth, linked by their   stands for the more rational, the balanced, the idealizing. It is typical of   the Campagna Romana and the Alban hills, forging from them “his own
 mutual emphasis on music and cultivation. On the left we see Apollo, here   the neo-classical Koch,” Christian von Holst observes, “that he should   melody of language and image.” ⁹ The result was a symphony of colors
 still a soft and beautiful youth, tending to the herds of King Admetos, the   focus on a mythological scene in which reason wins over emotion, but   structured by an exceedingly skilled draftsmanship, whose ultimate
 ruler of Pherae in Thessaly.   On the other side, we find a satyr who is about   in such a way that the contrast between the two does not affect the   sentiment, however, went beyond a quest for formal beauty. A deeply
 2
 to challenge the Olympian to a musical contest (or maybe, this has already   fundamental harmony of the Arcadian landscape.”   This is one possible   progressive thinker, his association with this particular geography, like with
 4
 happened?). Be this as it may, Apollo’s servitude to a mortal master was the   reading; yet it seems equally likely that we witness the moment just before   the Alps before, were as emphatically personal as they were profoundly
 punishment inflicted upon him by his father, the mighty Zeus, for having   Pan or Marsyas (or both?), is reckless enough to challenge the immortal   political. Melodic yet erudite, emotional yet rational, the scenery ultimately
 killed the Cyclopes, the makers of his thunderbolts. Admetos, however,   opponent.   Apollo agreed, but only under the condition that the victor   reveals itself as a testimony to Koch’s revolutionary ideals, to his never-
 5
 treated the young God well; Apollo repaid the king’s kindness manifold, not   could do as he wished with the loser. In Marsyas’s case, this would lead to   ending advocacy for personal freedom and human self-fulfillment.
 least by helping him to win his chosen bride, Alcestis, and making all the   sadistic bloodshed.   Winning by trickery, the God brutally murdered his
 6
 king’s cows have twins. In this scene, however, Apollo is shown as the   rival, suspending Marsyas from a pine-tree and then flaying him alive.
 harbinger of education, peace and prosperity. Even the ever so rowdy   The memory of this vicious act lurks beneath the landscape’s serene
 he-goats at the river bed have been appeased by the sweet sound of his lyre.   surface, especially for those contemporary viewers familiar, like the artist,
 On the other side of the brook, a group of satyrs and their entourage look   with Karl Philipp Moritz’s influential Götterlehre of 1790.   Those viewers,
 7




 70                                                                                                                         71
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76