Page 27 - Tzurba M'Rabanan Volume1
P. 27

ןנברמ אברוצ                                                    ׳א הרז הדובע תוכלה · 25



        name of Heaven with something else, we have not found that it   ןיפתשמש יפ לע ףאו םימש השועל םתעד
        is prohibited to cause others [gentiles] to partner (a deity with   רוסאד  ןחכשא  אל  רחא  רבדו  םימש  םש
        G-d), and there is no prohibition of lifnei iver (assisting another    ינבד אכיל רוע ינפלו ףתשל םירחאל םורגל
        in violating a transgression), for the children of Noach were not    .ךכ לע ורהזוה אל חנ
        commanded regarding this.

        The Rema rules in accordance with this opinion of Tosafot:


        a    Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 156:1                      א:ונק ח״וא | ע״וש    9 .
        And one should be careful in making partnerships with gentiles;   בייחתי אמש ,םיתוכה םע ףתתשהלמ רהזיו
        perhaps [the gentile] will obligate himself to swear [against him]   ךיפ לע עמשי אל םושמ רבועו העובש ול
        and [the Jew] will violate “[The names of other gods] should not        .)גי:גכ תומש(
        be heard through your mouth.”
                                                           םע  תופתוש  תיישעב  ןיליקמ  שיו  :הגה
        Rema:  Some are lenient regarding partnerships with gentiles    ןמזב םיתוכה ןיאש םושמ ,ז”המזב םיתוכה
        nowadays because the gentiles nowadays do not swear by    ןיריכזמד  בג  לע  ףאו  ,א”עב  םיעבשנ  הזה
        idolatry. And even though they mention the idol, nevertheless
        their intention is to the Creator of Heaven and earth, except that    ץראו  םימש  השועל  םתנווכ  מ”מ  ,ז”עה
        they join the name of Heaven and foreign gods. We do not find    אלו  ,א”דו  םימש  םש  םיפתשמש  אלא
        that this [violates] “before a blind person you shall not place a    ןתת אל רוע ינפלו :םושמ הזב שיש וניצמ
        stumbling block,” because [gentiles] are not warned against shituf   ןירהזומ םניא ירהד )די ,טי ארקיו( לושכמ
        (partnering G-d with another deity).                                     …ףותשה לע

        However, Rav Ovadia Yosef rules that Christians are considered idol worshipers, citing the interpretation of
        the Noda B’Yehuda.

        p     Responsa Yechaveh Daat 4:45                      המ:ד | תעד הוחי ת”וש   . 10

        However in the responsa of the Noda B’Yehuda (Tanyana, Yoreh   קלח  ,אנינת(  הדוהיב  עדונ  ת”ושב  םלוא
        Deah 148) he writes “that which is thought of as a precious   אלגרמד יאמו ,בתכ )ח”מק ןמיס העד הרוי
        expression by people – that gentiles are not commanded   לע  םיווצמ  חנ  ינב  ןיאש  ישניאד  והיימופב
        regarding shituf – this is a mistake and it arose due to the ruling    רבד  םהל  אציו  ,םדיב  אוה  תועט  ,ףותישה
        of the Rema, but in truth this is not the intention. Rather it is    תמאבו .)ו”נק ןמיסב( א”מרה בתכש הממ הז
        to say that when a non-Jew takes an oath by his idol together with    עבשנ יוגהשכש רמול אלא ,ןכ הנווכה ןיאש
        the name of Heaven, and does not say “you are my G-d” he is    וניאו  םימש  םש  ףותיש  םע  הרז  הדובעב
        not warned against [doing] this.” Accordingly, with regard to the    .’וכו  ךכ  לע  רהזומ  וניא  ,התא  ילא  רמוא
        practices to which the Christians are accustomed to performing
        in their churches, where they bow and prostate themselves    םירצונה  םיגהונש  המ  יפל  הז  יפלו  .ש”ע
        in the manner of worship of a deity, they certainly have the    הדיקב  תוהלא  ךרד  םש  םיספותש  היסנכב
        status of idol-worshipers [as a result], in accordance with    הדובע ידבוע ןיד םהל שיש יאדוב ,היוחתשהו
        the opinion of the Rambam and [other] poskim that write    ובתכש  םיקסופהו  ם”במרה  ירבדכו  ,הרז
        that Christians are considered idol-worshipers. 3          .םה הרז הדובע ידבוע םירצונהש

        3.   It should be noted that Rav Ovadia is referring specifically to Catholicism here, which does include prostration in this manner as part of their
           service. However, many other sects of Christianity do not include this as part of their worship, such as Protestants, Seventh Day Adventists, etc.
           According to this logic, it is possible that the method of worship of such sects may not be considered avoda zara, though their conception of God
           may still qualify as an avoda zara belief. For a brief discussion of this as well as a thorough analysis of the issue of entering a church, see the lengthy


                  This volume is not to be distributed.  Copies are for the personal use of purchaser only.
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32