Page 5 - 01. Indian Contract Act, 1872
P. 5

Acceptance

                         It means giving consent to the offer.
                         Sec,  2(b)  of  the  person  to  whom  the  proposal  to  the  person  making  the

                          inquiry
               Essentials of a valid acceptance

                     It must be absolute and unqualified.

                     It must be communicated to offeror.
                     It must be in the mode prescribed.

                     It must be given within reasonable time
                     Mera silence is not acceptance offer can prescribe the mode of acceptance but

                       not the mode of rejection.


                  Relevant Case Law :
                 *       Felthouse Vs. Bindley
                  Facts.

                  (i)    F offered by letter to buy his nephew‟s herse for £ 30 stating “If I hear no

                         more about it, I shall consider it mine at £ 30.”

                  (ii)   Nephew did not reply, but told the auctioneer not to sell it as he has already

                         sold it to his uncle.

                  (iii)   Auctioneer sold it by mistake

                  (iv)   F sued the auctioneer

                         Decision – F could not succeed as his nephew has not communicated his

                         acceptance


                     It must be given before the offer lapses

                     It must emanate from offer

                     It  the  offer  is  one  which  is  to  be  accepted  by  being  acted  upon,  no
                       communication of acceptance  to the offeror is necessary, unless communication

                       is stipulated for in the offer itself

                  Relevant Case Law :
                  *      Lalman Shukla  Vs. Gouri Dutt
                  Facts
                         (i)    S sent his servant L, to trace his missing nephew
                         (ii)   Later , S offered a reward for finding out his nephew
                         (iii)  L traced him ignorant of the reward
                                                              5
                         (iv)   L clamed his reward  later.
                  Decision – L was not entitled to the reward.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10