Page 366 - SEC_2017WorkingDocument_Neat

in errors occurring Better tracking system for
 In a group with multiple teachers, there was sometimes the GP numbers assigned to
duplication of GP numbers assigned within the sample students’ work.
generated – e.g. teacher 1 –student was GP07 and teacher 2 – User must be able to
another student was also assigned as GP07. This made it check which file has been
difficult to name both files – since the GP numbers were uploaded to avoid
identical. mistakes.
 The interface for the upload of the files does not allow the user Streamline the system to
to see which file has been uploaded. There is no way to double allow all samples for the
check the files which have been uploaded and possible errors subject to be uploaded at
will not be identified. one click.
 The ‘upload was successful’ button has to be clicked for each Verification email should
file that is uploaded individually. be sent immediately to
 The successful upload email is sent to the principal’s email – same interface, not just
the person entering the data does not have access to this – thus the school’s email
there is a time lapse in the upload of the samples and the accessed by the Principal:
verifying that the upload was successful. avoid delays.
 Sometimes the system appeared to be uploading the file but Fix glitches in the system
when the sample uploaded report was checked not all 5 where user accomplishes
samples were uploaded. This resulted in the process being tasks for uploading
repeated several times. samples, no indication of
 It was difficult to get the samples for Spanish and French in the error, but verification
required file format and file size for upload. report, sent later, indicates
 The process of scanning documents and preparing the files for missing files.
subjects with Modular tests (e.g. Pure Maths and Accounting) System needs to allow for
was tedious. audio files which are
trickier to load (French
and Spanish).

21