Page 407 - Truncal States to UAE_Neat
P. 407

Chapter Nine

                Iran swept through every majlis or the other littoral Guir states,
                demonstrating to the Rulers the urgent necessity for closer political
                co-ordination among themselves. On the 25th to 27th May 1981 the
                six Heads of Slate of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE,
                and Oman formally established the Gulf Co-operation Council,
                which had been in the making since January 1981. On this occasion it
                was again shown forcefully lhat, even at such a regional event, only
                the UAE’s national leadership nowadays acted on behalf of the
                federal stale.
                  Thus the foreign policy of the UAE was successful in firmly
                placing the new Slate on the map regionally and internationally, from
                which it could no longer be erased without provoking an inter­
                national outcry.
                  During and after the 1973 October War the UAE actively
                participated in the revived drive for closer Arab co-operation and the
                more concerted, deliberate and even aggressive foreign policy of the
                Arab World.
                  The very successful foreign policy was equally beneficial in
                rendering further credibility to the Federation at home. The majority
                of the population in the seven Emirates took much less time than
                expected to transfer much of its tribal allegiance from the local Ruler
                to the UAE government and its President, particularly when it
                became obvious that their new State was recognised, respected and
                even courted by governments and organisations the world over.
                Growth of the federal administration
                To many outside observers and to many participants in government,
                progress  towards the creation of federal authorities and the transfer
                of local administration to the latter appeared loo slow. They would
                favour a much tidier and more manageable highly centralised
                administration. This view is shared by foreign technocrats, by
                commentators who lack experience of federal systems, and by many
                of the educated, young and often idealistic nationals who became
                civil servants in federal ministries.
                  Yet if one recalls the reluctance of some regional governments to
                integrate their administration into the new systems, and if one
                considers the constitution’s deliberate imprecision on the procedure
                for the unification of certain authorities, the overall record of
                consolidation of the federal administrative authority has been quite
                spectacular in recent years.

                382
   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412