Page 28 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol II_Neat
P. 28

14

                      42. All the Rulers including the Sultan of Muscat are bound by agreement
                  not to permit the traffic in arms, and in all the Gulf States a system exists whereby
                  persons desirous of importing arms and ammunition apply to the local
                  representatives of His Majesty’s Government for a No Objection Certificate
                  (Appendix C). This system is not provided for in any of the arms agreements but
                  is accepted by the Rulers except that in Muscat the Sultan now only recognises
                  the grant of certificates by Her Majesty’s Consulate for consignments of arms and
                  ammunition from the United Kingdom and British possessions and requires them
                  to be worded as authorising the export of such consignments and not their import
                  to Muscat. In the United Kingdom and India no export of arms and ammunition
                  to the Gulf States is permitted until such a certificate is produced. In 1953 the
                  United States Government were asked to adopt a similar practice and agreed to
                  do so, except that in respect of arms and ammunition required for Muscat instead
                  of demanding the production of a No Objection Certificate they proposed to
                  consult the Political Resident through their Consul-General at Dhahran before
                  permitting export.C) A similar approach was subsequently made to the Govern­
                  ment of Belgium, Spain, Italy and France, and the Allied Military Security Board in
                  Western Germany.^) A satisfactory reply had been received from the Belgian
                  Government by the end of the year and there was no reason to believe that the
                  other authorities concerned would not comply with Her Majesty’s Government’s
                  request.

                                                 (e) Protocol
                      43.  A strict protocol is observed in the Gulf and there are numerous
                  occasions on which calls are exchanged. The rules observed by officers of the
                  Royal Navy and a Table of Precedence are appended (Appendix D). The
                  procedure for calls between Political officers and Rulers varies from post to post.
                  It is usual for political officers to call on the Rulers on the two Ids and for the
                  Rulers to call on the local political authority on Her Majesty’s birthday, which is
                  celebrated on April 21, and New Year's Day or Christmas Day. A list of the
                  Rulers with their titles, decorations and salutees as they stood at the end of 1953
                  is appended (Appendix E) Lists of the incumbents of the Persian Gulf posts since
                  1904, to bring the lists in Lorimer’s “ Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf ”(,0“) up to date,
                  are also appended (Appendix F). In the days of the British Government of India
                  the Political Resident was given the title of the “ The Hon’ble.” Since 1948 he has
                  been entitled “ His Excellency." The gun salutes enjoyed by the Political Resident
                  and other officers in the Gulf ports are given in the Table of Precedence
                  (Appendix D).
                      44.  The Political Resident is entitled to fly the diplomatic flag and other
                  heads of posts the consular flag. These flags are flown daily. British subjects and
                  protected persons are permitted to fly the Union Jack on specified occasions
                  (Appendix G (i)). Each Gulf State has its flag and ships other than men of war
                  visiting a State usually fly its flag at the foremast.(,<n) Bahrain is the only State
                  which has issued rules about the flying of flags (Appendix G (ii)). These rules have
                  not been applied by Regulation to persons subject to the Order in Council.


















                     (••) Washington to F.O. 11931/4/53 of June 30. 1953 (EA 1194/2 of 1953)
                     (»*) F O to Brussels. EA 1194/2 of October 23. 1953.
                         ^ro0,                       3. ^
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33