Page 278 - Gulf Precis (VI)_Neat
P. 278

248                     Part III.
                          copies of this correspondence to tlio Government of India addrossed a long domi-
                          oflioial to tlio Secretary, Foreign Dcpalrtmont, on the samo subject.
                              358.  Colonol Tweedio pointed out that the Porto had quito recently received
                          the viowsof Her Majesty’s Government on tho gun-boat quostion, and quoted
                          Lord Granville’s despatch to Musurus Pasha quoted above :—
                             *'In deference to the wishes-of tlio Sublime Porte, British ships-of-war do not proceed
                          further up the Shat-el-Arab than Kurna, but Her Majesty's Government aro not aware of
                          any regulation precluding such ships from visiting Basrah."
                             359.  In his domi-ofTicinl to tlio Secretary, Colonel Tweedio expressed the
                          opinion that as “a rulo and in the absence of special circumstances, ono gun­
                          boat at Basrah is enough at one and the samo tirao.” And ho thought that
                          the intense alarm which “ the sight of the British gun-boat caused to the
                          TJsmanli mind at the present period is of itself a kind of reason for not making
                          tho spectacle too familiar a one.”
                          (iv) Number of guns allowed to be carried by foreign vessels in the
                                               Shat-el-Arab, 1893.

                             3G0. The Turkish authorities further showed anxiety to restrict the privilege
                         which all merchant vessels have been enjoying from time immemorial to carry
                         four guns when avseending up tho Shat-el-Arah to protect themselves against
                         pirates. When this privilege was expressly granted and the number of guns
                         was limited to four, it is not possible to say. But the Turks now wished to put
                         a stop to the privilege. With this view the following communication was
                         addressed by the Valiof Basrah to the British Consul at Basrah on 23rd Septem­
                         ber 1893
                            u According to a vorbal communication1 of your Dragoman, guns and ammunition of
                         Indian vessels arriving from India and others, which wero for protection, aro taken by the
                         Mudir at Faoand on returning they havo to pay money. I have communicated with the said
                         Mudir on thu subject, who has replied by telegram that there is a decision that every vessel
                         bo allowed to carry four gutis only and the remainder kept by the Government on a receipt
                         until return of the vessel, and that this arrangement is for prevention of sale of the extra guus
                         by the crew’s to tbe inhabitants. I beg, therefore, that yon will bo good enough to instruct
                         those concerned and prevent them from keeping with them any extra guns than required and
                         also from selling any ammunition to inhabitants."
                             361.  It appears that the Turks formerly used to provide escort ships in
                                                      certain parts of tlio river to protect them
                           Political A., March 1881, No,. 2G-30, (No. 31).
                                                       against pirates. When this practice
                         ceased it is not known, and possibly when this sort of protection was withdrawn
                         ships were allowed to carry four guns. No papers can be traced on this point.
                             362.  Probably the Turkish authorities apprehended that- the privilege of
                         carrying guns would be abused, or possibly they were anxious to exercise more
                         than ordinary supervision on the Shat-el-Arab with the object of extending
                         their rights over the river, limited by the Erzeroum which accounts for the
                         precautionary measures taken by the Vali of Basrah.
                           (v) Levy of Customs dues by the Turks on imports and exports at
                                            Mohammerah, 1893-94.
                             363. In October 1893 tbo British Consul at Basrah received a complaint
                          flaerat E., May 1894, No.. 307-340.   from a Nakoda of a British Indian baghla
                          sea tbo Conaor. letter dated 13th Ootober to tha that on arrival in the Shat-el-Arab with a
                          40 n                        cargo of charcoal for Mohammerah, he
                            stopped by the authorities at Eao, and after undergoing 24> hours’ quaran­
                         tine the Customs authorities visited liis ship and asked him whero ho was
                         bound for. On informing them lie was bound for Mohammerah a paper was
                         given to him which ho was ordered to sign; this tho man naturally had to do
                         though lie did not know tho contents of tbo document. Ho was told lie must
                         produce this document boforo tho Customs authorities at Dowasir. On nrriva
                         at Dowasir his vessel was visited by Customs officials, and on liis saying lie
                         was hound for Mohammerah ho was allowed to go, no notico being takon or
                         the document he had received at Eao.   °
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283