Page 238 - Gertrude Bell (H.V.F.Winstone)_Neat
P. 238

216
                                        GERTRUDE BELL
                    beg leave to assure the Government that by birth, by training
                    and by temperament, I am in sympathy with a democratic as
                    opposed to a bureaucratic conception of Government, and if I
                    find myself unable to advocate the immediate introduction of
                    a logical scheme of Arab Government into Mesopotamia it is
                    because I believe the result would be the antithesis of a demo­
                    cratic Government and that the creation and maintenance of an
                    indigenous Arab Government is in consistent with the changes
                    which we are now endeavouring to introduce into the Govern­
                    ments of India and Egypt... ’

                 By now Wilson’s replacement by Cox was agreed in principle,
                 though the latter showed no particular anxiety to return. Mean­
                 while, growing personal animosity between the chief and his
                 distinguished assistant complicated the day-to-day life of the Civil
                 Commission. In December 1919, Wilson wired Cox: ‘Current
                 gossip that you are coming here, to be succeeded by Haig in
                 Tehran.’ And a month before Cox had wired to the effect that he
                 would not return except as High Commissioner. But that appoint­
                 ment could not properly be made until the mandate had been
                 settled and approved by the League of Nations. Clearly, however
                 Cox and Wilson intended the changeover to take place early in the
                 new year, for on December 20th AT asked Cox if he should order
                 furniture for him. Two days later, following the intervention of
                 Curzon, the return was postponed. By January 1920, Wilson seems
                 to have been at his wits’ end. On the 2nd he wrote a rambling,
                 almost incoherent letter to Cox which referred over and over again
                 to a nameless ‘individual’, and followed it with an even longer
                 draft telegram: ‘I do not think there will always be room in this
                 office for activities of the land which I suggest (in telegram).
                 The telegram will serve to show how the land lies.’ Correspondence
                 went on for two months, both men referring to an ‘individual’ or
                 to ‘him’ in the course of which Sir Percy tried to persuade AT to
                 stay on as his deputy. On March 10th, 1920 Cox wired again:

                    When your draft telegram of June 4 reached me ... I was
                    expecting order to proceed home at once and contemplated
                    asking you to defer decision in regard to individual referred to
                    until I got home ... I am now instructed to await my successor
                    expected in the latter part of May. Previous to receipt of your
                    letter and draft telegram I have received a letter from individual
                    indicating that there was some rift in the lute. I took it to be a
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243