Page 9 - DILMUN NO 7
P. 9

(s.v. No. 12) and pp. 208-210.
                                                      11.   C. J. Gadd, op. cit. (my note 1), p. 208.
                                                           note 1.
                                                      12.   In addition, to our fig:. 7, a similar repre­
                                                           sentation of a “waterman” is found in a
                                                           seal in the Staatlichc Museum. Berlin :
                                                           published by Anton Moortgat in Vorder-
                                                           asiatische Ilollsiegel (Berlin, 1940), PI. 65 :
                                                           545. It should be mentioned, however,
                                                           that Buchanan obviously discounts such
                                                           Near Eastern connections for the “water
       1.   This description is quoted from C. J.          carrier” on the Gulf seal from Ur. in which
           Gadd’s article, “Seals of Ancient Indian        he secs “a clear case of Indian influence”
           Style Found at Ur.” The proceedings of          (Briggs Buchanan, “A Dated Seal Impre­
           the British Academy XVIII (1932), p. 194.       ssion Connecting Babylonia and Ancient
       2.   For a seal which I date in the first Early     India,” Archaeology 20 (1967), p. 105.
           Dynastic Period in contrast to Briggs       13.  For the sign of the Ilarappa script showing
           Buchanan. who dated it in the protohis-         a water carrier, cf, Marshall, op. cit.
           toric period, cf, his Catalogue of Ancient       (note 9)P. 446, No. 192 ; for an Egyptian
           Near Eastern Seals in the Ashmolean             representation, of Louise Klebs, Die Reliefs
           Museum (Oxford, 1966), PI. 1 : 2, and my        und Malereien dcs Mittlcrcn Reiches
           comments in Bibliotheca Orientalis XXVII         (Abhandlungendcr Heidclberger Akadeinie
            (1970), p. 8. For seal designs of the Second   dcr Wissenschaftcn, phil, hist. Klasse. 6
           Early Dynastic period, cf Buchanan, op.          Abhandlung 1922), p. 76, Abb. 52.
           cit., PLs. 11-13. On the following plates   14.   Drawings of these figures were published
           of the same catalogue, which show seals of      by William J. Hinke, A New Boundary
           Third Early Dynastic period, the eye of          Stone of Nebuchadnezzar, I (Philadelphia.
           many of the animals is still indicated by a      1907), p . 103, Fig. 38, and by Alfred
           hollow.                                          Jeremias. Ilandbuch der altorientalischen
        3.   E.g., Kuml 1966. p. 79, a and f, from a site   Geisteskultur (2nd ed.; Berlin and Leipzig,
            on the north coast of the island, known as      1929), p. 209. Fig. 125.
            Qala’at al-Bahrain.                        15.   “ New Votive Plaques from Nippur. ”
        4.   C. C. Lamberg - Karlovsky, “ The Proto-        Journal of Near Eastern Studies XXII
            Elamite Settlement at Tcpe Yahya, ” Iran        (1963), PI. V.
            IX (1971). pp. 139-152.                    16.   E.g., Sir Leonhard Woolley, Ur Excava­
        5.   Pierre Amiet, La Glyptique mesopota-           tions, II : The Royal Cemetery ( London,
            mienne archaique (Paris, 1961), PI. 14 :235.    1934 ), Pis. 193 and 194. On the latter
        6.   M.E.L. Mallowan, “ Excavations at Brak         plate. Nos. 25 (U. 14443) and 30 (U. 122258)
            and Chagar Bazar.” Iraq IX (1947), PLs.         show only the male figure drinking
            XVIIJ : 1 and XX : 14 ; text, p. 122. It is     through a tube while the women holds a
            interesting that these schematically rend­      cup.
            ered feet resemble closely those on the    17.   E.g.. the clay plaque from Tello reproduced
            later seals from Bahrain mentioned above        by Marie-Therese Barrelet. Figurines et
            in note 3. Seal designs of Susa B pub­          reliefs en terre cuite de la Mesopotamie
            lished by Amiet also show related elements      antique (Institut francais d’archeologie de
            which may be abbreviated renderings of          Beyrouth, Bibliotheque arch et hist.
            feet : Glytique archaique. PI. 6 : 119 A and    LXXXV, 1968), PI. L : 527, and the list
            122.                                            given by Ruth Opificius, Das altbaby-
        7.  Cf. T.G. Bibby in Kuml 1957. p. 157, re­        lonische Terrakottarelief (Untersuchungen
            porting on the relative stratigraphic           zur Assyriologic und altbabylonischen
            position of the seals in Fig. 13, a-c.          Archaologie 2. 1961), pp. 166-167, especially
        8.  Briggs Buchanan, “A Dated ‘Persian Gulf         Nos. 604-606. 608, 609, and 612.
            Seal and its Implications,” Studies in     18.   Buchanan, op. cit. (my note 8). p. 206. note
            Honor of Benno Landsberger ( Oriental           14, cites the two exceptional scenes with
            Institute, University of Chicago, Assyri-       the woman in the superior position. Most
            ological Studies 16, 1965). pp. 204-209.        others conform to the type shown in the
        9.  Sir John Marshall, Mohenjo-Daro and the         clay plaques cited in note 20 above.
            Indus Civilization (London, 1931),PI. CXII:  19.   Kuml 1966, p. 79.
            383.  I wish to thank Corethia Qualls for   20.   One of the impressions on clay from seals
            reminding me of this seal.                      in private collections offered to the parti­
       10.  C.J. Gadd. op. cit. (my note 1), PP. 199-200    cipants at the Conference in 1970.
                                                 — 9 —
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14