Page 24 - Historical Summaries (Persian Gulf - Vol II) 1907-1953
P. 24

11
         the buoying of the channel to Ras Tanura.(7?) In 1947 they objected to the erection
         of a light beacon on Farsi Island which they claimed (chapter 3, paragraph 65).
         In 1951 a proposal which they made for the erection by them (i.e., by the Arabian
         American Oil Company) of six lights to mark the Ras Tanura channels was agreed
         to on the understanding that this would not be treated as establishing the ownership
         by them of the sea-bed concerned and that they would raise no objection to the
         replacement of the light on Farsi Island by a more powerful one(7‘) In 1953 the
         service agreed to comply with requests received from the Saudi Government
         Railway and the Arabian American Oil Company for the servicing of lights
         belonging to them on the understanding that the servicing of their own navigational
         aids would take precedence and that they would be indemnified against any possible
         claim arising from operations carried out on behalf of the railway and the oil
         company.(”)
            33.  The Californian Arabian Standard Oil Company (later the Arabian
         American Oil Company) agreed to pay for the servicing of buoys which the service
         was asked to instal in 1938 but were unwilling to pay a general contribution to the
         service’s fund in India until the concurrence of the Saudi Arabian Government had
         been obtained. That Government at first proposed a formal agreement between
         themselves and the Government of India on the subject but in 1944 agreed to the
         matter being arranged direct between the company and the service,(76) and a lump
         sum contribution was in due course recovered from the company. In 1948 when the
        Arabian American Oil Company were asked to pay regular light dues on the
         shipping calling at Ras Tanurah, for which they acted as agents, they thought it
         might be necessary to consult the Saudi Arabian Government before complying
         with the proposal.(7T) It is not known whether such consultation took place, but no
         further diffculty arose and in 1953 dues were being recovered from owners of ships
         visiting Ras Tanurah and Dammam by either the London office of the Service or
         Messrs. Gray Mackenzie and Company at Bahrain.
                            (b) Currency and Exchange Control
             34.  The currency in general use in the Persian Gulf States is the Indian rupee.
         In Muscat the Maria Theresa dollar is also current and in the interior it is the only
         currency which is acceptable. There is also a small coin called the baiza. The
         Sultan in 1948 had a number of these minted and attempted to regulate their rate
         vis-a-vis the Indian rupee and the Maria Theresa dollar (chapter 6, paragraph 111).
         Apart from this there is no local legislation regarding currency in any of the Gulf
         States and there is nothing in the nature of legal tender. In 1947 the status of the
         rupee as the principal circulating currency of the Gulf was described by the
         Government of India as a purely commercial one and the banks were stated to have
         no statutory connections with the rupee or obligations in relation to rupee
         currency.f8) The British banks in Bahrain, Kuwait, Dohah, Dubai and Muscat
         and the Kuwait National Bank in Kuwait are ordinarily the only means of
         exercising any control over currency and exchange and have always shown
         themselves willing to co-operate with Her Majesty’s Government in dealing with
         these matters.
            35.  Territories within the sterling area as defined by the Defence (Finance)
         Regulations issued at the outbreak of the Second World War and “ Scheduled
         Territories ” as defined by the Exchange Control Act of 1947 included “ any British
         Protectorate or British Protected State.”(79) This definition covered all the
         Shaikhdoms but not Muscat, which has however been treated as administratively
         within the sterling area. The consent of the Rulers concerned to this arrangement
         was never sought but in 1947 the Commonwealth Relations Office considered that
         it nught perhaps be implied, as they had made no complaints against the operation
         of foreign exchange restrictions.
            36.  At the end of 1947 a suggestion was made that the Persian Gulf should
              uS nWin- currency but was not seriously considered at the time. In April
         iv48 the Pakistan Government began to issue its own currency. The banks in the
            C2 TCLfromlJ5?da^° F0- 131 of September 14. 1938 (E 5423/453/91 of 1938).
            JJ rcida i0J-°-       of January 9. 1952 (EA 1402/4 of 1952).
            <f) tf-0- to P.R. EA 1401 /6 of June 15. 1953.
            )..{ hO- to F.O. Ext. 5308/45 of November 2. 1945 (E 8470/1455/91 of 1945).
            L\          i°ctober22- l94« (E 14388/175/91 of 1948).
            L! £ P-O. Hxt.973/4 of May 7. 1947 (E 5912/1540/91 of 1947).
            t ) C.R.O. to F.O. U.n. of January 5. 1948 (E 278/115/91 of 1948).
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29