Page 161 - Gulf Precis (VII)_Neat
P. 161

17
              C6. It is not necessary to enter into a detailed account of his proceedings,
                                        and it is sufficient to state that little was
           Gulf Administration Report for 1898-99.
                                        done beyond harrying the country and
          levying revenue. A few men were executed, but the popular opinion was that
          they were not the real criminals, and ransoms were taken from wealthy persons
          who fell into the hands of the “ Army.” The expedition was believed to have
          been financially a success, but it is doubtful if it had much lasting effect on the
         Tangastanis, or if any punishment reached those really to blame for the troubles
         which occurred in the early part of 1898. The Said-us-Sultan came to Bushire
          on the 20th May, and took up the post of Governor. He was recalled, however,
          immediately afterwards by the Governor-General, and returned to Shiraz with
          the greater part of his troops. It will be remembered that the Tangastani
          leader, Ali Khan, was believed to be the instigator of the attacks on the Bushire
          Residency, and on Mahmond, the jemadar of the Telegraph Department, whose
          relatives were killed and whose house was looted in March 1898. Immediately
         after these crimes, Ali Khan fled from the Imamzada where he had been in
          “ Bust,” and returned to Tangistan. His enemy, Hyder Khan, joined Said-us-
          Sultan, and having made a valuable present to him was confirmed in his posi­
          tion of Tangistani Governor. Ali Khan hearing of this fled to a port higher
          up the coast, with the intention of going by sea to Basra. No attempts being
          made, however, to seze him, he returned to Tangistan, from where he com­
          menced writing to Mahmond and to the Residency declaring his innocence
         and threatening that, if the efforts which were being made against him were
         not relaxed, he would come in and take “ Bust ” with Mahmond. It should
          here be explained that this custom of taking “ Bust ” is carried in Persia to
         such a length that an accused person can enter the house of his accuser, who
         is bound to receive him, and unable to take any steps against him, while he is
         in “ Bust.1* Ali Khan did not eventually go to Mahmoud’s house, but applied
         to the Residency authorities, stating that he would come in and surrender
         himself, provided he receded a fair trial, and that a promise was given him that
         he would not be handed over to the Persians. The Resident, Colonel Meade,
         was at that time away from Bushire at Shiraz, and Mr. Prideaux, Assistant Resi­
         dent, agreed to Ali Khan's proposal. He came in accordingly, and an investi­
         gation, which was held, pointed strongly to his connection with the crimes
         which occurred while he and his followers were staying at the Imamzada. Claims
          therefore of 4,000 tomans wrere put forward by the Residency as compensa­
         tion to those who had suffered. Ali Khan would probably have paid the amount,
          but he w'ished to be assured that he would not be molested afterwards by the
          Persian Government. This assurance the Residency were unable to obtain, and
          Ali Khan was told that as he had come in on the safe-conduct of a British officer,
          he was free to leave the Residency, where he had been living for six months,
         whenever he pleased, but that as he had not paid the compensation demanded,
         an endeavour was made to recover it through the Persian Government, to whom
          he was subject. A formal demand was made by the Minister at Tehran. Ali
          Khan owned considerable landed property on the Bushire Island, and the out­
         rage on Mahmond originated in a dispute over a waterway. It had not a politi­
         cal object, and Mahmond was attacked not because he was a British protege,
         but for personal reasons.
             67. On the 22nd August 1902 it was reported that Saiyid Yusuf Mehrkani,
                                         a partizan of Shaikh Muhammad Joasmi,
           Gu f Administration Report for igoa 03.
                                        who had seized Lingah a few years pre­
         viously but was soon expelled by the Persians, had arrived from Arab coast at
          Dooan on the Persian side. A few days later it was reported that he had seized
         and burnt 40 packages of dates which belonged to the Persian Government and
         were  being brought to Lingah from the interior. The Deputy Governor of
          Lingah took steps to defend the place and the latest news received about Saiyid
         Yusuf was that he had left Persia and crossed over to Katar. His Excellency the
          Salar-i-Moazzim arrived in Lingah on 17th October in the Persepotis and landed
         with some troops from Bushire and a ship’s gun. He is said to have recovered
         a fine of 6,000 dollars from Shaikh Yusuf bin Ahmed of the Bu Smeit tribe and
         his brother whom he had arrested on the charge of having favoured the  cause
         of the rebel Saiyid Yusuf and to have then released them, taking from them a
         paper in which they declared their allegiance to the Persian Government.
               S640FD
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166