Page 169 - Gulf Precis (VII)_Neat
P. 169

25
           Government. But it came from a private source. In June 1863 Mr. Aitchin-
                                         son, who was then compiling the Bombay
              Political A., January 1864. Nos. 948-49.
                                         Treaties, called for an authentic copy of
           the agreement. Revd. Mr. Badger, the well-known Arabic scholar, who was
           then engaged on the Maskat-Zanzibar Commission, obtained —
              ** a copy of the treaty referred to on the original Persian, together with an English
           translation of the same from an Arabic version, furnished by His Highness the Sultan of
           Maskat.''
               101. In Revd. Mr. Badger’s translation, article 12 restricted the grant
           “ to the person of Saiyid Said, who is now living, and to his children"
           (ou/ad) In article 4 the privilege of selection of a Governor is vested in the
           “Imam and his sons.” In 1864 Colonel Felly submitted translation of the
           agreement made from the Persian original, which was inserted by Mr. Aitchin-
           son in his Treaties. It differs slightly from Badger’s translations, but both
           agree on limiting the terms of the farm to Saiyid Said and his sons. The
                                         point was raised afterwards whether the
             Polit'cal A., J*nuary 1865. Nor.. 115*116.
                                         word * oulad ’ was not wrongly translated
           and should not include grandsons and further issue (see paragraphs 103 ct sc(j.
           below).
          XVI.—Revocation of the lease-of Abbas, etc., on the death of Saiyid Thoweni and
                     succession of Saiyid Salim, his son and its renewal, 1868.
               10a. After the death of Saiyid Thoweni, and on the accession of Saiyid
                                         Salim, grandson of Saiyid Said, Colonel
              Political A., June 1868, No«. 151-59.
                                         Felly at first reported, on the authority
              No 47, dated atst Match 1867.
                                         of two independent but unofficial sources,
           “that the Persian Government had consented to farm Bandar Abbas and the
           adjacent districts to the present Sultan of Muskat, as they did to his late father.”
               103.  A fortnight later he reported that the Persian Governor of Fars had
                                         communicated to him the wish of the
                 No. 51, datod sth April 1867.
                                         Persian Government that Saiyid Turki,
           the younger brother of the deceased Sultan, should be nominated Governor of
           Bandar Abbas, in which case the lease would be continued, though at an
           increased rent. The Prince Governor in this communication brought forward
           the argument that Saiyid Salim, as grandson of Saiyid Said, could not continue
           to hold under a lease granted only to Saiyid Said and his sons.
               104.  This argument was reiterated by the Prince Governor at an interview
            Seo Colonel Peiiy'* letter No. to6, doted sth which Colonel Felly had with him in the
           September 1667.               course of the next few months.  The
           Prince informed him that the lease of Bandar Abbas had been renewed at an
           enhanced rate of 20,000 instead of 16,000 tomans in favour of its former Arab
           Governor, Sheikh Said, a relation of the Maskat family, but as a direct
           dependent of Persia, and not in his capacity as representative of Maskat.
               105.  The neighbouring port, Lingah, which had been included in the
           original lease, was about the same time made over in name to Hajee Ahmed,
           late Vizier of Maskat, but in reality remained in the hands of its former Arab
           Governor. The Hajee Ahmed thus mentioned had now again been received
           into favour by Saiyid Salim.
               106.  Matters remained in this state till the spring of the year 1868.
           Throughout the winter Saiyid Salim was too much occupied in the difficult
           task of securing himself in the Government of Maskat to be able to devote
           attention to the former dependencies of his family on the Persian side of the Gulf.
               107.  The Persian Government, however, found that they had a by  no
           means submissive lessee in Sheikh Said. Their demands for the balance of
           tribute were rejected by him, and, accordingly, the Prince Governor of Fars  set
           out for Bandar Abbas with the view of coercing him.
               108.  The Shah was much alarmed by the aggressive attitude of the Maskat
           Arabs, and requested the good offices of the Government of India for the pro­
           tection of Persian territory and commerce.
               ,09;Jn reply Mr. Alison was informed that the Sultan of Maskat had too
           much difficulty in maintaining his position to be of any cause of just apprehen­
           sion to Persia.
                S640FD
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174