Page 273 - Gulf Precis (VII)_Neat
P. 273

129
            1872, and that the local authorities were informed of this appointment in
           September 1873, that nothing beyond the ordinary commission fees had been
           paid to the Prince Governor and his subordinates.
               452.  On the 22nd January 1875 Colonel Ross addressed a letter on the
           whole case to Mr. Thomson, stating, with regard to the pressure put upon
           Muhammad Baker to sign the bill of sale, that whatever coercion had been used,
           must heve been employed by the Foreign Agent himself, but the latter in a
           letter to the Resident, dated 3rd June 1871, had distinctly denied that any
           oppression had been exercised towards Agha Muhammad Hassan, whose treatment
           seemed to be the ground for the statement that Muhammad Baker had signed
           the bill of sale under coercion.
               453.  This was further disproved by the evidence of the Assistant Resident
           and by a document obtained by Abboo Nubbee from the principal persons who
           were witnesses to the execution of the bond, to the effect that no compulsion
           had been used.
               454.  With regard to the charge of bribery, Colonel Ross explained that,
           though he could speak with confidence on such a subject, he believed that fees
           of some sort were given, but this
           11 is the invariable custom in this part of Persia when such transactions take place, and
           would scarcely be cited except for party purposes ”
               It may be noticed that Hajee Nubbee Khan stated that these fees amounted
           only to 10 or 12 tomans, while he gave the Foreign Agent himself 200 tomans.
               455.  Colonel Ross was of opinion that the injury to Hajee Nubbee Khan had
           been planned by the Foreign Agent deliberately; he was well aware of the position
           the former held, and if he succeeded in his object, “ it is to be expected that
           parties in our employ will be made to suffer in property and position.”
               456.  The correspondence between the Resident in the Persian Gu.f and
                                          Her Majesty’s Minister at Tehran
               Political A., August 1876, Nos. 35*41.
                                          on the subject resulted in the issue of an
           order, dated 24th March 1875, from the latter to the Persian Foreign Office
           Agent at Bushire, directing him to make over the house to its “ former owner.”
           The Foreign Office Agent however declined to act at once on this order pretend­
           ing ignorance as to whether the words “former owner” applied to Hajee
           Muhammad Baker or to Hajee Abdool Nubbee. He therefore telegraphed
           to Tehran for precise orders on the point, and was of course informed in reply,
           dated 19th April, that the house was to be given to Hajee Abdool Nubbee.
           A correspondence on the subject then ensued between the Foregin Office Agent
           and the Assistant Resident, and it was not till the 21st of April that the claimant
           was placed in undisputed possession of his property : and when he did proceed to
           take it over it was found that the delay caused by the Foreign Office Agent’s
           reference to Tehran as to the mcening of the words “ former owner” had been
           utilized to throw the house into a ruinous condition. The wooden fixtures such
           as doors and screens had been removed; the verandahs had been demolished;
           and altogether damage to the extent of 730 krans worth had been committed.
           Further, the Foreign Office Agent when informing Hajee Abdool Nubbee of the
           order from Tehran gratuitously insulted him by hinting that his son associated
           with disreputable persons. He moreover encouraged the original owner, Hajee
           Muhammad Baker, and his family to make the house untenable by giving
           annoyance to any party when Hajee Abdool Nubbee might place therein.
               457.  Colonel Ross in reporting the above occurrences to Her Majesty’s
           Minister at Tehran remarked that the whole proceedings of the Foreign Agent had
           apparently been prompted by personal animosity towards Hajee Abdool Nubbee,
           and not by any wish to be offensive to the local British authorities. He how­
           ever added that it was extremely desirable that the Foreign Office Agent should
           be given to understand that he must be more careful in his actions towards per­
           sons under the protection of the British Government. Finally, Colonel Ross
           stated that it appeared to him appropriate that Mirza Muhammad Khan should
           be made to pay the value of the damage done to Hajee Abdool Nubbee’s house
           by his instigation or with his connivance.
                 S640FD
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278