Page 389 - Gulf Precis (VII)_Neat
P. 389

41
               “ The sea-port of Charbar also fell into the hands of tho Arabs in the time of the 6ame
                      Charbar             Sultan bin Ahmed, of Muscat. A party of Arabs
                                          under one Saif bin Ali, was sent across from
            Oman in small vessels, who entering the bay under pretence of fishing, took the Helachia by
            surprise, and seized their fort. It has since remained in tho hands of the Arabs.”
               48. The remaining extracts from this Report had special interest, as
            bearing more directly upon tho recent development of affairs:—
               “On the death of Nussir IChan, the Gitclilcis took advantage of troubles at Kelat to
            revolt and sh iko off tho Kelat j oke. They were again reduced to obedience by Mehrab
            Khan in 1881, since wheu no serious disturbances have occurred affecting the Khan’s
            supremacy. This is in groat measure to he attributed to the tact and enorgy of the present
            Naib, Mir Faquir Mahomed, who lias allied himself by marriage with the Gitchki familj', and
            acquired undivided power in tho proviuce. Fuquir Mahomed lias had struggles with Azad
            Khan of Khnrnn, anil with the Mote tribe at Toonip. On one occasion, upwards of 15 years
            ngo,  he advanced with a force of 8,000 men against G wad nr, and succeeded in levying a sum
            iu ransom.  Shah Kasim, a Gitohki Chief, had several years before made a similar attack,
               “ Whilst Eastern Mekrau was thus being brought under the sway of Kelat, the western
                                          divisions were falling to the share of Persia, A
                     Persian Districts.
                                          Persian Governor was established at Bam pur,
            and lator, Geli, Kusscrkund, Dizzuk, Shirbaz, Baho, etc., were forced to pay tribute to the
            Persian representative. In accordance with tho customary policy, neither Persian odicers nor
            Persian troops were placed in oharge of these districts. So long a6 their own Chiefs satis­
            fied the demands of Porsia, they were left unmolested. The districts of Geh, Kusserkund
            and Baho, Dustyaii, are under tho oharge of a Gitchki Chief, named Mir Abdullah, who
            is Naib on the part of Persia, and acts under tho orders of Ibrahim Khan, the Persian Gov­
            ernor at Bampur, who, in his turn, is subordinate to the Wnkil-ul-Mulk of Kerman. Subor­
            dinate to Mir Abdulla are the Judgal Chiefs of Baho and Dustyari, Mahomed Ali and Din
            Mahomed. The remaining Persian districts are also governed by BelucU Chiefs, who
            render account of the revenue to Ibrahim Khan.
               “ It bus been seen that the eastern half of Mekran has fallen to tho share of the Kelat
                                          State, and now forms part of what may be
                       Government.
                                          termed ‘ Independent Beluchistan.’ The west­
            ern half is more oriels directly subject to Persian sway. The Kej division is at the present
            day under the general supervision of Faquir Mahomed, the Khan’s Naib, and Punjgur
            uuder that of Mir Esa, a Gitchki Chief. These Chiefs, however, interfere but little with
            the administration of justice, etc., iu the various subordinate districts, where the local Chiefs
            exercise unlimited power within their respective limits. Laws, as we understand them,
            thora are none, and order is only enforced by the most primitive and summary means, and
            there is but little formal protection for life and property. The system of blood feuds has for
            ages been iu force, and, for waut of a more regular appeal to justice, exercises a wholesome
            influence.
                  «        o       a        «       *        *       *
               “ The Naib, resident at Kej, is held responsible by the Khan for the collection of
                                            revenue. As has been mentioned one-half is
                        Revenues.
                                            allowed to the Gitchki family. In Kej,
            Toornp, and Nussirabad, where the Gitchki Chiefs reside, they themselves collect the revenues
            of their estates, and pay over the proper share to the Naib. In the other districts the revenue
            is collected by the bead meu and made over to Faquir Mahomed, who pays the Gitchki Chief,
            Mir Bayan, his allotted share. The system observed of imposing the taxes is as bad as
            could be. The agriculturists bear the burden almost alone, and of these the poorer only,
            the rich and powerful being usually exempted. One-tenth of the produce of the fields aud
            groves is the property of tho Slate, added to which is a tax on inheritances. These, vrith
            exception of occasional fines, aro the only sources from which the State derives revenue.
            Trade aud manufactures escape free. The land tax would, no doubt, produce a considerable
            iuoome, were it not that whole classeR have been exempted by grants from its infliction, and
            these the wealthiest of the people. In Kej it is estimated that four-fifths of the land
            property is owned by Qitchkis, Sungors, and others, claiming absolute immunity from all
            taxatiou. Under these circumstances, the amount of income actually realized is ridiculously
            small compared to the produce of tho country. From the Kej proviuce, after payment of
            expenses, the balance 6ent to the Khan’s Treasury seldom exceeds Rupees 10,001) annually.
               “From Punjgur it is believed be receiveo about Rupees 20,000.
               “In the Persian Districts much the same system prevails. The amount paid by the
            Judgal Chiefs of Baho aud Dustyari is above Itupccs 5,000 annually to Mir Abdullah.
            When the people cannot or will not pay tho tenths, a forco is collected, which ravages the
            refractory districts,”



               46-26 F. D.
   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394