Page 211 - Arabian Gulf Intellegence
P. 211

*

                                            MUSKAT.                            169
               5. The Muskat Arabs in 1705-06 were still infesting the coast,
                   a. d. 1705-06.   taking every ship they could overpower.
               6* In the following year their attention was turned to a more regular
                                    system of naval warfare, for they obtained per­
                   a. d. 1706-07.
                                    mission from the King of Pegu to build ships at
             the ports in his country, and spread their fleets over the seas which
             surround the peninsula of India. Some of their ships carried from
             thirty to fifty guns. They made descents on several towns on the
             Malabar Coast, both to obtain plunder and a fixed station, from which
             they might annoy the trade, or resist the Mogul or Muratha fleets, or even
             the more powerful vessels of the European nations.
               7.  These depredations led to the Mur at has* equipping a fleet of
             sixty vessels, not only to repel the Arabs, but to act also as pirates
             against all defenceless vessels.
                8.  The captures by the Arabs and Murathas became so numerous
             that the King of Persia contemplated the deputation of ambassadors to
             Bombay and Batavia, to solicit naval aid against the pirates. It having
             been considered politic to prevent the adoption of either of those
             measures, as the first would only have exposed the then weak state of
             Bombay, and the second, if complied with, might have obtained a
              preference to the Dutch in the Persian market, our Agent in Persia
              promised, as soon as the war in Europe should cease, that a naval force
              should be sent to destroy the pirates.
                9.  Without detailing the various depredations committed by the
                                    Arab cruisers, it may be stated that the imbecile
               a. d. 1707-08 to 1717.
                                    6tate of the kingdom of Persia in the commence­
              ment of the last century was favourable to the growing power of Muskat,
              the ruler of which was at this period master of all the islands in the
              Gulf; and it is probable that it maintained its ascendancy in that
              quarter during the establishment of the Afghans in Persia, or until the
              year 1730.
                10.  Bahrein was taken from the Arabs in the reign of Nadir Shah,
              by Mahomed Takee Khan, the Governor of Fars, and there can be no
              doubt of the influence of Persia having been completely restored by
              that prince in the Gulf, as even the Muskat Government was at this
              period obliged to pay tribute to Persia.
                11.  The Persians were driven out of Oman by Ahmed bin Saeed,
              the Governor of Sohar, for which act he was elected Imaum. He led
              an army by land towards Ras-ool-Khyma, and would have reduced the
              Seer principality to his allegiance had he not been abandoned by some

               * The piracies of the Muskat Arabs gave rise to another formidable pirate, Angria of
              Colaba, in the vicinity of Bombay.

                                                                                            7~
                                                                                               .


                                                                                        -

                                                                       - -A S m  -V
           ____                                    v'«
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216