Page 22 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol II
P. 22

9
       protested at the recovery of these dues at Bahrain without his consent.!31) In 1952 he
       requested representation on the Local Committee and instructions were issued that
       if he raised the matter again he should be told that membership of the Committee
       was confined to major users of the lighting service but that arrangements would be
       made to send him notices and agenda of meetings and that the attendance of his
       representative would be welcome at such meetings as might interest him.!52) He
       had not reverted to the subject by the end of 1953.
          26.  Difficulties have also arisen about the representation of the United
       States Navy on the Committee. The United States Navy had declined to pay light
       dues on their contract-operated tankers, which are manned by civilian personnel.,
       and it was decided that they should not be offered representation on the Committee
       until these dues were paid. It was, however, agreed that information should be sent
       to the United States Navy in the Gulf concerning all major matters affecting aids
       to navigation in the Gulf, that they might be invited to send a member to attend
       meetings of the Committee as an observer and that the matter would be considered
       again if a formal request was received from them for representation on the
       Committee.!53)
          27.  In the days of the British Government of India the Necirchus while
       working for the Persian Gulf Lighting Service outside Iraqi waters used to fly a
       blue ensign defaced with the Star of India.!'4) This arrangement had been approved
       by the Iraqi Government. After the transfer of power in India she wore for a time
       the Indian and Pakistani flags, but after the service had been taken over by His
       Majesty’s Government, the Iraqi Government refused to agree to her wearing a
       British flag and she wore the Iraqi flag on all occasions.!55) In 1951 it was agreed
       that the service’s flag should be a defaced blue ensign but that this should be flown
       only in the lighthouse tender, launches and other sea-going craft and possibly on
       the service's offices at Bahrain.!58) The Political Resident did not consider it
       desirable that it should be flown on any lighthouse or light-vessel for fear of
       incidents of which serious notice might have to be taken.
          28.  During the last war and for some years after few new works had been
       undertaken but since the formation of the company in 1950 new lights have been
       installed on Farsi and Halul islands, a new light on Kubbar island is under
       construction, a radio beacon has been installed on Little Quoin Island and a
       number of improvements have been effected elsewhere.
          29.  From its earliest days the service maintained lights and buoys on both
       shores of the Gulf, and up to 1928 it had been found possible to prevent
       the Persians from interfering.!57) In 1929 they proposed a conference with a view to
       their taking over control of the service in Persian waters. Nothing came of this
       but in 1933 they stated they were considering making arrangements for the
       management of the beacons and lighthouses in their territories and waters!5") and
      sent a Frenchman to inspect them including that on Tamb. In 1934 they informed
       His Majesty’s Legation at Teheran that they wished to assume responsibility for
       lighting and buoying on their coast and that they proposed to purchase all existing
       installations except the Qais light-vessel. His Majesty's Government agreed in
       principle and a protocol was drafted and handed to Persian Government in 1936.(5*)
       Meanwhile proposals were considered for a new route for shipping which would
       avoid any dependence on lights for which the Persians were responsible. In 1937
       the Persians decided not to buy any of the existing installations and asked for then-
       removal as their own installations became ready. In 1940 their lighthouses at
       Bushire and on Qais Island started to function, but with the Allied occupation of
       Persia in 1941 the question of the removal of the Persian Gulf Lighting Service
       installations was dropped.
          30.  In 1946 these installations consisted of some buoys at Bushire, a light-
       vessel off Qais Island and a lighthouse at Jask.(t0) The Persian Government had
          (3I) Tel. from P.R. to F.O. U.n. of November 21. 1948 (E 14980/175/91 of 1948).
          (”) F.O. to P.R. EA 1401/3 of January 23. 1953.
          (”) M. of T. to F.O. M (NA) 32/2/OL of December 4. 1952 (EA 1402/20 of 1952).
          !34) C.R.O. to F.O. Ext. 739/48 of March 23. 1948 (E 3861/175/91 of 1948).
          (S1) Bagdad to F.O. 1213/10/50 of June 2. 1950 (T 8/4 of 1950).
          (*•) P.R. to F.O. 2071 /8 of Aprif 7. 1951 (T 10/4 of 1951).
          (") Paras. 20-27 at p. 141-143. P.G. 13.
          !5*) Teheran to F.O. Despatch 407 of August 22. 1933 (E 5348/3062/34 of 1933).
          ( ) Teheran to F.O. Despatch 327 of June 26. 1936 (E 4382/159/34 of 1936).
          C°) I.O. to F.O. Ext. 8327/46 of November 30. 1946 (E 12260/656/91 of 1946).
            46639                                                   C 2
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27