Page 93 - Records of Bahrain (4) (ii)_Neat
P. 93

Regional relations, 1927                 395
                                            21
             until the arrival of the Resident. In the meantime the Persian sufferers had
             telegraphed to the Shah and had been informed in reply that the British Govern­
             ment would take action on their behalf.
                 An undesirable incident in which a German was assaulted occurred about
             the same timo in which no redress could be obtained.
                 12. On 21st January 1005 the Viceroy despatched a message to the Secretary
             of State from which the following is an extract :
                 “ Tho incidents reported appear in our opinion to warrant and necessitate
             vigorous measures with Shaikh who is only encouraged in his obstinacy by our
             continued forbearance.
                 His obstinate attitude in regard to proposed Customs Reforms was explained
             in our despatch of 21st April 1001 and apart from this present ease he has shown
             a disposition to ignore the advice of our new Political Agent. The appeals for
             our assistance received from subjects of the German and Persian Governments
             seem to minimise grounds for any international objection and makes the present
             opportunity favourable for proclaiming our protectorate ’. .
                 13. The Resident, Major Cox, spent four days discussing tho ease of the
             Persians, but without result, the Shaikh maintaining that Persians were under his
             jurisdiction and that the ease must bo tried by the Bahrain courts.
                 The status of the Persians as foreigners resident upon an Island under British
             protection together with the certainty of justice being perpetrated should the
             ease be made over to a Sunni tribunal forbade any concession on this point.
             Deadlock ensued and Major Cox left the Island on 10th December to report
             the situation to Government. On the 23rd February 1005 he returned to
             Bahrain as the bearer of demands authorised by 1 Lis Majesty’s Government
             upon Shaikh Isa. lie had been empowered to enforce compliance with the same
             by Naval force if necessary and the British Cruiser IT. M. S. “ Fox ” and the gun­
             boats II. M. S. “ Redbreast” and II. M. S. " Sphinx ” were assembled in tho har­
             bour.
                 An ultimatum was delivered to the Shaikh from which the following is an
             extract of the orders received from Government:—
                   “ Demands should be prefaced by a reference to the long continued support
                        accorded to the rulers of Bahrain and to the present Shaikh by the
                        British Government, who caused the usurper to be expelled, himself
                        to bo installed and the succession of his son to be recognised.
                   The Shaikh should be reminded of his assurances to follow the advice of
                        the Political Resident ”.
                 14. Government in their memorandum of demands directed the Resident to
             state—
                   “ You have not maintained your friendship towards the British Govern­
                        ment and have conducted yourself in a manner which cannot be
                        permitted to continue. In the event of any continuance or rep-
                        tition of an unfriendly attitude, all support and assistance, whether
                        diplomatic or military, which you, or your predecessors, have en­
                        joyed will bo withdrawn from you, and may possibly take another
                        direction ”.
                 A warning was conveyed to 1 famad, the heir-apparent, whose attitude through­
              out the crisis had been as little satisfactory as his father’s, that the ultimate re­
              cognition of his claims by the Government of India would depend upon his future
              conduct.
                 15. In his No. 123, dated 11th March 1005 Major Cox stated that he regard­
              ed it as a matter of considerable regret that the exigencies of Imperial politics
              did not admit of our making our moral protectorate into an open and effective
              one at the present juncture. In a later letter, lie stated that lie based suggestion
              he had made on the facts that:—
                   1. The Prime Minister in a speech had referred to Bahrain as a British
                        Protectorate,
              MCu'JlFl)
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98