Page 695 - PERSIAN 5 1905_1911
P. 695

08            ADMINISTRATION REPORT OF THE PERSIAN GULF

          Lutas n (6ce last year’s report) who had transferred their domicile from
          Debai to Ajman, in enticing away divers from Debai. Later in the year he
          ceased to pay attention to friendly remonstrance, and even proceeded to
          ignore the Residency Agent’s communications, and on the Resident’s arrival
          at Maskat from India, in March, reports which reached him from the Resi­
          dency Agent made it evident that Shaikh Horaeid needed to be brought to Ilia
          bearings without delay. A visit was, therefore, paid to Ajraan in the
          R. I. M. S. “ Lawrence ” en route to Bushire. The Shaikh was ordered on
          board and called upon to show cause why he should not be fined under the
          Diving Code. For some time he maintained a demeanour of bluff and
          antagonism, but eventually gave it up and expressed contrition; paid the fine
          of Rs. 2,500 imposed upon nim, ana promised to turn over a new leaf. It
          will be interesting to see how lie shapes when the projected wireless station
          is installed at Zora, a project which will need cautious handling.
              Relations with Shaikh Sagar have been satisfactory, and he has been
                                         tractable in connection with Abu Musa
                        arg ‘            affairs and such other business matters
          as have had to be transacted with him. Unfortunately the epidemic of
          plague, which visited Debai so heavily at the commencement of the hot
          weather, spread to his port, and it is believed that 400 or 500 deaths occurred
          during the outbreak.
              The Abu Musa dispute with the German Government pursued the tedious
          tenour of its way during the year and was still unconcluded at the end of it.
          In May, the Resident submitted his reply to the German rejoinder and this
          was forwarded with the endorsement of the Government of India to His
          Majesty’s Government. It is understood to have been communicated to the
          German Government in December accompanied by a memorandum proposing
          settlement by a compromise, the effect of which would be, while safeguarding
          the Shaikh's rights, to restore Messrs. Y/onckhaus, as far as possible, to the
          commercial position occupied by them at the moment when their operations
          were stopped by the Shaikh of Shargah’s action. There the matter stood at
          the end of the year. Meanwhile, in order to convince the German Govern­
          ment that we were ready to meet them in any reasonable way, His Majesty's
          Government acceded to a request from the latter that Messrs. V/onckhaus
          should be permitted to remove more of the oxide already mined, with the
          proviso, however, that the time limit of December 1912 should be placed upon
          their operations.
              Except for the connection of the principality and others with the Arms
                                         Traffic, which will be dealt with sepa­
                     Abu Dhabi.
                                         rately, the affairs of Abu Dhabi have not
          been in evidence, and the behaviour of the Shaikh has been satisfactory.
              The following development has taken place during the year, in connec­
          tion with the time-honoured Taona Piracy Case. The pirate “ Gaithoo,”
          whose capture was chronicled in the Administration Report for 1909 (page
          67), was detained in custody at Bahrain through two pearling seasons in the
          hope that the repeated endeavours of His Majesty’s ships and Political
          Officers to capture his two brothers would be successful, and that, it would be
          possible to arraign the three brothers together. All efforts, however, proved
          jkorUve, and as Gaithoo’s conduct, during a confinement of over two years,
          had been exemplary, and it appeared difficult to continue it indefinitely, it
          r?S e<^’ October, in communication with the Government of India and
          His Majesty’s Minister at Tehran, that he should be released and that we
          must content ourselves with the hope of eventually making good the claim
          for pecuniary compensation against the Persian Government.
                                            It is convenient to take up the thread
                       Debai
                                          of Debai affairs from where it was left
                                          by the Report of 1910.
              The feud between the Shaikh and the Bin Luta family seems to die
                                          hard and has continued to be a source of
                  The Bin Luta Family.
                                          inconvenience and friction during the
          year. An interesting coincidence in connection with this case is noticed.
   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700