Page 520 - PERSIAN 8 1912_1920_Neat
P. 520

a      ANNUAL BEPOBT OF TEE P BBS IAN GULF POLITICAL RESIDENCY
                         In February the 14th 8ikhs loft for Mesopotamia, and the remainder of th
                     garrison continued unaltered till the ond of the year. No military operatio *
                     took place.                                                    n*
                        There have been few events of permanent importance; the history of th
                                                   year is a miserable record of cross’intrieiip!
                      Coodltiotii In Btiliir* HlnUrlu.d and on
                     Sbbaz road.                   and futile fighting, due in the main to
                                                   the clash of interests between
                     blackmailers on the trade route. The effect of tlie agreement under which the
                     release of the 8biraz colony has been effected has been to give the rebel Khatu
                     a direct interest in avoiding direct conflict with the British authorities, while
                     it has on the other hand tied the hands of the Residency in dealing with abn^
                     on the road. It is scarcely worth while to trace in detail the petty squabble*
                     which from time to time attained a temperary prominence, and the broad
                     features of the situation may be briefly sketched as under :—
                         The year opened with Nacir-i-Diwan of Kazerun in open rebellion, and
                     flushed with his success against the South Persia Rifles on the Pir-i-Zan Pass.
                     The spring and early summer were occupied in attempts to induce Soulet-ed.
                     Dowleh to oome off the fence and co-operate whole-heartedly in the maintenance
                     of order. As the result of an interview between the Soulet, Colonel Gough and
                     General 8ykes, which took place at Khaneh Zinian on 25th May 1917, Soulet
                     entered into a formal agreement, binding himself as follows :—
                           (а)  to guard the Shahi road from Tang-i-Turkan (one stage belo*
                                Kazerun) to Dashtarjin with his own men ;
                           (б)  to guard the Shahi road from Dashtarjin to Chenar Rahdar jointly
                                with the South Persia Rifles;
                           (c) to provide 450 men for the above two purposes, these men to b;
                                paid from Shiraz at the rate of Tomans 5,050 per mensem ; the«
                                arrangements to last for three months at least;
                          (<f) to keep Nostr-i-D\waa out of Kazerun for six months and put in hi*
                                own Deputy Governor;
                          (e) to capture or expel Muhammad Reza Dirisi, the notorious anti*
                                British pamphleteer, from Kazerun;
                         (/) to be responsible for the good behaviour of his tribe and par
                                revenue, in return for which he would be supported in bis
                                position as HkbanL
                        Soulet succeeded without fighting in inducing Nasir-i-Diwan to ahsent
                     himself from Kazerun for a few weeks only; he failed to molest Muhammad
                     Reza in any way; and the only other two results of the agreement worth
                    noting are (a) that the Persian Government thought it necessary to notify its
                     disapproval thereof, and (b) (hat Soulet’s guards on the stretch shared by hiw
                    wifh the South Persia Rifles immediately began to take rahdari, and Souiet
                     replied to an expostulation on this point by demanding an additional sum of
                     Rs. 300 per mensem as compensation if rahdari were abandoned. In b short
                    the agreement was not a succees. In August the Governor-General himself
                    8aw 'Soulet at Dashtai^in and as a result expressed his desire to pardon Nasir-i-
                    Diwan and wrote letters to Zair Khidac and Wassmuss, with the appareo
                    object of conciliating the former and inducing the latter to leave, by Jjj*
                    promise of a safe-conduct to Germany. Another thread running through »
                    tangled skein of Kazerun affairs is the feud between Muhammad Ali
                    K&lant&r of the Kasbkoli section of the Kashgai, and Nasir-i-Diwan. O
                    result of the continued disorders on the Shahi road has been to awaken
                    cupidity of the Kashgai chiefs in respect of the settled Tillages near the rooj1-
                    Muhammad AH Khan (leader of the attack, on the Central India Hors®
                    1911), who owns (while he can hold it) the village of Shahpur near Kazoruo.
                    conceived the idea of extending his influence across the Kazerun pi*1® 1 •
                    N ozth to South, and seized the Rahdar caravanserai, and the pass of 1*®$
                    T urban* commanding the entry of the main road into the Kazerun P . f
                    His rival in the Kashguli section, Muhammad Khan, also prosecuted sub ^
                    a mbitioni as regards several villages in Kamarij and Kbisht, and attempt®?^
                    o ccupy the village of Dins near Kazerun. In these quarrels Nasir-i'-G
   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525