Page 810 - PERSIAN 8 1912_1920_Neat
P. 810

7 G                ADMINISTRATION REPORT OF THE

                  and Jinnali was that allotted to Kuwait by tlic Anglo-Turkisli Convention
                  when the Turks were still in Ilasa. It was subsequent to tins that Ibn Sa’ud
                  conquered Ilasa, and when lie did, it wus with the help of Kuwait. Tie agreed
                  with the ruling that the question of zahal and raids could not bo included in
                  the Arbitration, but, as ho feared that they might become cause.of dispute
                  between Ibn Sa’ud and himself in the future, lie said ho hoped that Govern­
                  ment would give him her assistance at the time of the Arbitration in forming
                  a treaty with Ibn Sa’ud with a view to maintaining peace and removing all
                  causes of disagreement between thorn.
                      Ibn Sa’ud’s reply, dated the 5th September, was received at Bahrain also
                 on the 17th September. He too accepted all conditions as laid down provided
                 His Majesty’s Government guaranteed no hostile act against bis borders
                 pending the decision of Government. Regarding the boundary between his
                 territory and Kuwait, he claimed the whole cotmtry up to the walls of Kuwait,
                 on the ground that all this had belonged to his grandfather and great-grand­
                 father between the temporary intiusion of the Turks, at which time he said, the
                 Sheikhs of Kuwait only held jurisdiction in the town itself.
                     Meanwhile, ever since receipt of Ibn Sa’ud’s last letter, Sheikh Salim bad
                 been making preparations for war so as to be ready in the event of Ibn Sa’ud
                 making a move before arbitration could be arranged. All minor raids which
                 took place were attributed locally to Ibn Sa’ud’s instigation, as also was an
                 alleged case of piracy against a Kuwait pearling boat. The boat in question,
                 a shn'ai, returned to Kuwait on the 12th September, and, according to the
                 statement of crow, the incident took place on the 28th August. The men said
                 that while they were taking on board fresh water from a spring in the   sea,
                 known as Gkamisah, off the coast of Jubail, two boats approached them,  one
                 from each side, and opened fire on them. The nakhucla was killed and the
                 rest of the crew jumped overboard. The jnrates then boarded the shu’ai and
                 helped themselves to everything on board, including cash to the value of
                 Rs. 1,400 and their pearls, after which they promised the crew their lives if they
                 went on board again. The crew went on board and were taken to Jubail, -where
                 the)* were kept under an escort on their shu'ai for eight days, while the Amir
                 of Jubail apparently communicated with Ibn Jilawi. At^the end of that period
                 they were released and their property was returned to them. The Political
                 Agent, Kuwait, examined twelve of the crew independently and could detect
                 no sign of their story being a fabrication. According to the Jubai version,
                however, as told to the Political Agent, Bahrain, the whole affair was merely
                a fracas over water and there was no question of piracy at all. Whichever
                story was true there was, of courfe, no reason to suppose that Ibn Sa’ucl him­
                self was implicated.
                    Similarly Ibn Sa’ud brought various complaints against Sheikh Salim.
                On 18th August ho wrote that he had approached Ibn Tawalah and other
                Shammar with a view to stirring up strife against lnm-Ibn Tawalah had arrived
                in Kuwait as Shaikh Salim’s guest at the end of July. In his letter of oth
                September he complained of a raiding party under Da’ij and Ibn Tawalah,
                which Shaikh Salim had sent from Jahrah. This party bad also been reported
                by the Sheikh of Bahrain as having come south, apparently with the avowed
                intentions of attacking Jariyah. There can be no question that such a party
                did go, and it was never denied in Kuwait, but there it was described as a
                reconnaissance and not a raiding party. He also wrote to the Political Agent,
                Bahrain, on 13th September, enclosing a letter dated 8th September, from
                Ibn Shuquair regarding a raid by Ibn Tawalah, ‘AH al-Khabfah, and other
                members of the Subah family, which probably refers to the same party.
                    On the 20th September Shaikh Salim assured the Political Agent that he
                had then none nearer'the frontier than Jahrah, except for a few parties of
                scouts, and guaranteed that in future no such party should exceed five men.
                    A letter, dated 8th September, from Ibn Sa’ud to Ibn Shuqair regarding
                the fortification of Jariyah, which was intercepted by one of Shaikh Salim’s
                patrols, caused great indignation in Kuwait in view of the fact that it was
                written after ibn Sa’ud had accepted the. conditions of Arbitration laid down
                by Government.
   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815