Page 106 - نموذج

19
Sample Recommendation Report 549

14
6
6 5.85
5.57
5 5.35
4.92
4
Mean Score 3 2

1
0
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Questions
figure 2. attitudes of faculty experienced with clickers

Appendix A, page 22, presents the raw data that are summarized in Figure 2.
Markel_67948_19s-b
We distributed Faculty Questionnaire 2 to the 56 instructors who had never
taught with clickers (or taught with them for only one semester) but who
regularly teach lectures with more than 100 students. Of the 56, 42 responded.
Figure 3 shows the mean responses to the five questions (with 1 5 “strongly
disagree” and 6 5 “strongly agree”):
Q1. I would like to make my lectures a more active learning experience for
students.
Q2. I would like to improve my ability to know how many students understand
the concepts I am trying to present during my lectures.
Q3. I would like to be able to automate tasks such as taking attendance or
delivering quizzes quickly and accurately using clickers.
Q4. It is very important to me that CMSU select a versatile, dependable clicker
and provide adequate technical support for faculty who choose to use it.
Q5. I would be very interested in learning more about how I could use clickers
in my lecture courses.

19_MAR_67948_Ch19_512-562.indd 549 11/29/11 3:36 PM