Page 143 - Agroforestry system - book inner (final corrected) - 9.-3-21_Neat
P. 143

National level e-symposium on “Agroforestry system for augmenting livestock
                                productivity and empowering resource poor rural farmers”



             many local varieties of crop/tree species.  Urbanization and land fragmentation has exhausted many of these
             natural varieties.

                 Socio-economic transformation triggered by globalization and market driven lifestyle has prompted
             people to do away with traditional agricultural practices which are ‘labour intensive and time consuming’.
             The shift towards development oriented non-agricultural land use practices has started manifesting its far
             reaching consequences in all spectrum of human life such as escalated rates of landslides, soil and water
             conservation, poor drainage, massive soil erosion and associated loss of soil fertility.  Need of the hour is
             to hold lessons from the advantages of homesteads as invaluable sustainable farming system that integrates
             diverse crop forms to meet the multitude of benefits to mankind.

             Conclusions

                 The traditional homegardens are characterized by multistrata composition often mimic the natural forest
             in structure and composition. They are ecologically sound, economically viable, socially acceptable and
             culturally pragmatic systems influencing livelihood and nutritional security of millions people in the tropics.
             The favorable biophysical environment promotes high level of association and comlementarity among the
             various components that guarantee sustainability of homegardens.  The high floristic diversity attached to
             these systems has evolved through preferential selection followed over generations.  Apart from the multitude
             of direct benefits, the array of ecosystems services rendered by the homegardens distinguishes them as robust
             land use system. Their resilience and adaptation potential to climate change and associated climatic extremes
             are tremendous.
                 Despite all these multifarious advantages, homegardens are yet to receive recognition that they deserve
             neither at the policy level nor at scientific front.  Moreover, this time-tested agrarian tradition appears to
             fade out under the pressure of urbanization and globalization.  Influx of monoculture, land fragmentation,
             alternative market avenue for homegarden products and fast changing socio-economic and cultural equations
             have put serious threats on the future of these wonderful systems.  Unless concerted efforts are attempted at
             regional and policy levels, these unique systems will wither away shortly.

             References
             Abebe, T., Wiersum, K.F., Bongers, F. and F. Sterck. 2006.  Diversity and dynamics in homegardens of
                 southern Ethiopia. In: Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Tropical homegardens: A time-tested example
                 of sustainable agroforestry. pp 123–142. Springer Science, Dordrecht.
             Albuquerque, U.P., Andrade, L.H.C. Caballero, J. 2005. Structure and floristic of homegardens in Northeastern
                 Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments 62 (2005) 491–506
             Altieri, M.A., 1999.  The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems.  Agriculture, Ecosystems &
                 Environment 74, 19–31.
             Asfaw, Z. and Woldu, Z. 1997. Crop associations of homegardens in Welayta and Gurage in southern Ethiopia.
                 Sinet (an Ethiopian J Sci) 20: 73–90.
             Calvet-Mir. L, Gómez-Baggethun, E. and  Reyes-García,  V. 2012. Beyond food production: Ecosystem
                 services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain.
                 Ecological Economics.  Volume 74, February 2012, Pages 153–160.


             124   Institute of Animal Nutrition, Centre for Animal Production Studies, TANUVAS
                   National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148