Page 114 - Pundole's Auction M0015
P. 114

58 #

     PROPERTY FROM THE GLENBARRA ART MUSEUM, JAPAN

     MANJIT BAWA                                                                             Khanna further elucidates, ‘The balloon-like shapes found
                                                                                             an easy and logical transition into his human, animal and
     1941?–?2008                                                                             plant shapes. He was making a philosophical assertion
                                                                                             in addition to the aesthetic which naturally followed. He was
     A Goat, a Girl and a Tree                                                               implying that the same force inhabits all creation.’ (Krishen
                                                                                             Khanna, Let’s Paint the Sky Red Manjit Bawa, New Delhi,
     Oil on canvas                                                                           2011, p.?101) The work formed part of his collection for
     1982                                                                                    many years before becoming part of a museum collection.
     54 × 72 in. (137 × 183 cm.)
                                                                                             Bawa’s paintings are defined by a pure, simple style that
     Bearing a label ‘Name of Artist: Manjit Bawa / Title of                                 use large, flat, saturated fields of colour and bold, fluid
     Painting: A Goat, a Girl and a Tree / Year: 1982 / Size: 183                            outlines to depict a harmonious assortment of animals,
     × 152 cm / Collection: Krishen Khanna, Delhi.’ on reverse                               human beings and popular figures from Hindu mythology
                                                                                             and religion. His works are dominated by colour over detail
     ??1,50,00,000?–?2,50,00,000                                                             and form over narrative. The influence of Indian classical
                                                                                             painting is also apparent in Manjit’s works. His figures
     $ 223,880?–?373,135                                                                     appear like images from Ragamala miniature paintings
                                                                                             of the Pahari courts, except they are transposed to a
     PROVENANCE:                                                                             monumental scale. Despite this explosion of scale, his
     Formerly in the collection of the artist Krishen Khanna.                                figures retain an expressive and narrative quality that
                                                                                             recalls the classical tradition. It is this unexpected balance
     LITERATURE:                                                                             between the huge forms and their lyrical treatment that
     Contemporary Indian Art, Glenbarra Art Museum Collection,                               creates such a powerful and immediate impact when
     Himeji, 1993, p.?132, illustrated.                                                      viewed.

     Upon Manjit Bawa’s death, his close friend and fellow artist                            Bawa’s choice of colours usually veer towards bright and
     Krishen Khanna commented: ‘Manjit and I worked in Ghari                                 bold colours, and very rarely would include what he referred
     (art studios in Delhi) together. We used to meet very                                   to the more staid greys or browns. ‘...My own idiom has
     frequently. And ours was a small group of painter-friends                               evolved further. Increasingly, I avoid clutter and paint in a
     and Manjit was the youngest of all’, says Khanna. ‘We were                              style that is minimalistic, austerely. Indic mythology, the
     all rather different painters, but obviously good friends. I feel                       epic mythic as well as impressions of life, people and
     very sad. His contribution to Indian art is very unique and                             animals inevitable find their way into my canvas and have
     I can’t think of anyone who painted like him.’ (Riddhi Doshi,                           become my dramatis-personae.’ (The artist in conversation
     ‘Memories of Manjit Bawa, Art World Mourns the Loss’,                                   with Ina Puri, Manjit Bawa, exhibition catalogue, Sakshi
     www.dnaindia.com, 29 December 2008)                                                     Gallery, London, 2005, unpaginated)

     Given their friendship, it comes as no surprise that Khanna                             One of the main themes of Manjit’s works, as seen in the
     collected his young friend’s paintings. Khanna saw the                                  current work, is the emotionally charged interaction
     current work at Manjit’s studio just after it was completed.                            between man and animals. As Kamala Kapoor explains,
     It immediately reminded him of The Sleeping Gypsy, a                                    ‘The balance of whimsical forms, shows Bawa’s control
     painting by the French Post-Impressionist painter Henri                                 of the problems of illusionistic space, figure ground
     Rousseau, which Manjit was completely unaware of.                                       relationships and narrative tension... Like his human
                                                                                             figures, his animals, hybrid, fantastical and sometimes
                                                                         Henri Rousseau      realistic and even phantasmic, function as autonomous
                                                                         The Sleeping Gypsy  entities with regard to overall composition. The artist has
                                                                         oil on canvas       developed a vocabulary for his images, both human and
                                                                         51"×?79", 1897      animal, that enables him to carry the narration and
                                                                         Museum of           metaphors on their own.’ (Kamala Kapoor, ‘Manjit Bawa’,
                                                                         Modern Art,         In Transit III Manjit Bawa Ravinder Reddy, exhibition
                                                                         New York            catalogue, Alexander Ochs Galleries, Berlin, 2005, p. 6)

110
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119