Page 29 - Updated SuDS Design & Evaluation Guide-Newham V3 Spreads
P. 29

In most locations the water table is likely to   studies and LLFA detailed requirements can   requires that greenfield runoff calculations   site specific evidences and mitigation
 Local SuDS requirements
 be found at depths of less than 3 metres.   be found on Newham webpage as below:  should be performed using the IH124 method   requirements provided to be evaluated by
 Ground water source protection zones are   LB Newham Flooding Webpage  as supported by the HR Wallingford UK SuDS   Newham Local Planning Authority.
 found in the northern part of the borough.  online greenfield runoff rate estimation tool.   London City Airport guidance on biodiversity
 Flood Risk and Sustainable Drainage:   Under the same concern greenfield

 Requirements and Guidance for Planning   calculations should adopt the default   and safeguarding
 Application  parameters (e.g. soil type) as provided by the   Pre-planning advice
 Newham Local Plan  UK SuDS tool as characteristic of the    Newham LLFA can provide pre-application               Local SuDS requirements
      application site location.                             advice for developments as part of a pre-
 Newham LLFA drainage pro-forma
      Newham LLFA will not object to greenfield              application consultation agreement with
 Highlights of main requirements:   runoff calculations based on Flood   Newham Local Planning Authority.

 •  All major development is required to   Estimation Handbook (FEH) methodology,   Please note that a fee specific to LLFA
 Fig.5 Newham’s main made ground   restrict post development runoff to   provided that the results are demonstrated to   services is required:
 (grey/grey hatched) and source   be largely consistent with IH124 methodology
 protection zones (shades of pink)  greenfield runoff rates unless it can be   Pre-Application Advice Guidance Note &
 demonstrated that site conditions prohibit   output from UK SuDS online tool and   Charging Schedule
 The combination of these factors may limit   the ability to do so.  representative of the application site in a
 potential for infiltration drainage. However,   pre-development greenfield condition.    LLFA advice can include providing specific
 •  All development must restrict runoff                     information on local flood risk, review of
 given the high variability in ground conditions   discharge within or to Critical Drainage   Newham LLFA does not accept the following
 found across the borough, it is recommended   approaches:   information provided by developer relevant
 Areas (CDA) to greenfield rates or below.                   to the SuDS design and making
 that developers carry out thorough ground   N.B. there are 15 CDAs in Newham.  •  urban soil types for Greenfield runoff
 investigations to establish the potential for   estimation   recommendations on compliance with local
                                                             and national policies.
 23   infiltration.  It should be noted that none of   •  Discharge to tidal water (i.e.  River   •  applying urban catchment parameters to   The above could be arranged by contacting   24
 Thames, Lea and Roding) will need to
 the above prevents use of SuDS within a
          runoff estimation
 development, if integrated into the design at   take account of the effect of “tide   Newham Planning Authority development.
 an early stage. In any case, above ground no   locking”, storm surge or submergence of   Local LPA and Stakeholder Engagement  control@newham.gov.uk
 infiltration SuDS measures can still be used in   the outfall, in order to prevent flooding.    In addition to LLFA the Environment Agency   Adoption of SuDS
 areas of contaminated ground provided that   An appropriate allowance in terms of   and Thames Water must be consulted with
 barriers to contain contaminants, such as   onsite storage should be built into the   concern of flood risk, discharge consents,   Newham will not adopt SuDS unless
 impermeable liners, are used to protect   drainage strategy.  building in proximity to flood defences   undertaken by LB of Newham on council
 groundwater.  •  Discharge to tidal water may not be   structures and watercourses.   owned land.  Applicants should therefore put
 restricted to greenfield provided scour/  London City Airport (LCY): Under concern of   in place arrangements for maintenance and
 Local SuDS specific requirements   erosion would not result, however a level   risk management (i.e. bird strike) LCY may   end of life replacement of SuDS. Details must
                                                             be provided to the LLFA to add to its asset
 Newham has developed a number of   of attenuation will be expected - normally   object to development proposal deemed   register. There are other Risk Management
 documents in connection with local flood risk   a 1 in 30 attenuation - to create SuDS   potentially to increase of bird presence in the   Authorities, such as Thames Water or TFL
 assessment and management. Main   features that provide additional benefits.  airport safeguard area. Whilst this concern   that may be willing to consider adoption of
 requirements applicable to major   Application of Greenfield Runoff Rates  should be heeded and early consultation with   SuDS. Early engagement with the relevant
 development are fully embodied in Newham’s   To enable consistency of assessment   City Airport is advised, LCY’s general concern   party is critical to ensure their requirements
 local policy (Newham Local Plan 2018).   should never be used to scope out
 between planning applications, Newham   requirement of green infrastructures,  such   can be achieved.
 Links to relevant Newham policy, flood risk   LLFA, in its Statutory Consultee function,
      SuDS, nor LCY’s objection accepted without


 Newham Council SuDS D & E Guide                                                                       © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates  Newham Council SuDS D & E Guide                                                                        © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34