Page 22 - Bioterrorism
P. 22
21
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=aShZig0Cig4g.
Andrew Rambaut, a viral geneticist at the University of Edinburgh, has said: “The new
neuraminidase gene that came in from Eurasian swine is one we’ve never before seen circulating
in humans.”
“This is what we call a reassortment between two currently circulating pig flu viruses,” he said.
“Why it’s emerged in humans is anyone’s guess. It hasn’t been seen before in pigs as far as I
know.”
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-04/29/swine-flu-genes-from-pigs-alone.aspx
V. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” was bioengineered to resemble the Spanish flu virus of
1918.
Research scientist working on the recreation of the 1918 flu allege that the Spanish flu genetic
material has been re-engineered to synthetically create what is now known as the A/H1N1 virus,
or as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) calls it, the “novel flu.”
The Spanish flu genetic material was obtained from the corpses of victims of the 1918 Spanish flu
buried in the Artic permafrost.
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4724.shtml
The history of the synthetic H1N1 flu virus and a not-so-rosy future
By Wayne Madsen
Online Journal Contributing Writer
May 21, 2009, 00:20
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
(WMR) -- The history of the extraction of the genetic material from the corpses of victims of the
1918 Spanish influenza virus who were buried in Arctic permafrost is part “X-Files” and part
“Jurassic Park.”
After an unsuccessful 1951 mission, that involved U.S. biological warfare specialists, to extract
1918 Spanish flu genetic material in 1951 from a cemetery in the Inupiat Eskimo village of Brevig
Mission, Alaska, scientists made another attempt, a successful one it turns out, in 1997.
Dr True Ott has reported that the published definition of the swine flu by the NCSL is identical to
Jeffrey Taubenbergers 1997 initial findings concerning the 1918 killer virus which he successfully
resurrected 6 years later.
It easiest to explain this highly improbable match between the two viruses by assuming the „swine
flu“ virus was deliberately, and systematically engineered to resemble the 1918 Spanish killer flu
virus.
Dr Ott explains that Taubenberger’s initial 1997 report identified the 1918 killer virus as a “novel”
(new) swine flu that “recombined” avian (H5N1) as well