Page 49 - Bioterrorism

48

(“manslaughter”) of a 28-year-old woman from multiple sclerosis, allegedly connected to the
vaccine (Le Figaro 1/31/08).
>From 1994 to 1998, almost two-thirds of the French population and almost all newborn babies
were vaccinated against hepatitis B, but the campaign was temporarily suspended because of
concerns about side effects.
Some 30 plaintiffs, including the families of five patients who died after the vaccination, have
launched civil actions (Reuters 1/1/08).
A British case-controlled analysis showed an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI 1.5-6.3) for first
symptoms of multiple sclerosis in recipients of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine compared to
controls. Two previous French studies had shown a RR of about 1.5. Other studies showed a
nonsignificant increase or null findings, especially when date of diagnosis rather than date of first
symptoms was used (Neurology 2004;63:838-842).
According to attorney Clifford Miller, “British doctors administering hepatitis B vaccine to
infants could face criminal prosecution if fully informed consent is not obtained. Civil prosecution
for damages is possible over 21 years later if the injured survive as adults” (UK Press Association
Newswire/Romeike, September 2005).
The hepatitis B vaccine has been considered “one of the safest vaccines ever produced”
(Neurology, op. cit.). On the other hand, French medical expert Marc Girard has said that “for a
preventive measure, hepatitis B is remarkable for the frequency, variety and severity of
complications from its use” (Romeike, op.cit.)

http://www.jpands.org/vol11no1/girard.pdf

He gives evidence that WHO systematically manipulates scientific data to exaggerate the benefits
of vaccines and playdown the risks.

„Meanwhile, WHO or its “experts” go on publishing reassuring statements based upon an explicit
reference to a safety study that, according a public communiqué of February 2000, even the
French
agency decided to “discard.”An unfortunate misprint in Table 2 of this study—uncorrected to my
knowledge—allows the authors to halve the clear increase of multiple sclerosis in vaccinated
teenagers and young adults. Such an error would normally lead one to suspect fraud.

Girard calls WHO „merely a screen for the commercial promotion“ of vaccines.

He says notes that apparently neutal government boards are packed with vaccine company
employees.

„ In the promotion of the hepatitis B vaccination, WHO has evidently served merely as a screen
for commercial promotion, in particular via the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (VHPB), which
was created, sponsored, and infiltrated by the manufacturers. In September 1998, after the serious
hazards of the campaign had been given their first media coverage in France, the VHPB organized
a panel of “experts,” whose reassuring conclusions were extensive media coverage as reflecting
WHO’s position. Yet some of the participants in this panel had no
expertise beyond being employees of the manufacturers, and the vested interests of therest did not
receive any attention.“

World Health Organization Vaccine Recommendations: Scientific Flaws, or Criminal
Misconduct?