Page 172 - Fruits from a Poisonous Tree

156 Fruit from a Poisonous Tree

to the conversion of $27,000,000 (27 million) in gold (today that’s
$9.5 billion in FRNs factoring the price of gold at $352 per ounce),
contributed by the United States as part of its “quota obligations”
which the International Monetary Fund (Governor-Secretary of
Treasury) sold (Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pages 5945
and 5946) under questionable terms and concessions. (Also see: The
Ron Paul Money Book, (1991), by Ron Paul, Plantation Publishing, 837 W.
Plantation, Clute, Texas 77531.)

Invisible Contracts you have with the Secretary of the Treasury
for the use of the Federal Reserves private money

On October 28, 1977 the passage of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227
declared most banking institutions, including State banks, to be under
direction and control of the corporate “Governor” of the International
Monetary Fund. (Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, page 5942, United
States Government Manual, 1990/91, pages 480-481.) The Act further
declared:
“(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. §822 a
[b]) is amended by striking out the phrase ‘stabilizing the exchange value of
the dollar’...”
“(c) The joint resolution entitled ‘Joint resolution to assure uniform
values to the coins and currencies of the United States’, approved June 5,
1933, (31 U.S.C. §463) shall not apply to obligations issued on or after the
date of enactment of this section.”
The international organizations, corporations, and associations could
not pay and refused to pay their debts. They determined that they could pass
the loss of their non-redeemable, non-current notes, bonds, and evidences
of debt off onto others and thereby crown their fraud with success. (Letter
from Department of Treasury, Russell L. Hunk, Assistant General Counsel
(International Affairs), October 26, 1989, as recorded in the office of Clerk
and Recorder, Baca County, Colorado, at Book 540 page 364). The de facto
United States as Corporators, (22 U.S.C.A. §286 [e], et seq.) and “state” had
declared “insolvency” (26 USC § 1651[g][1], Westfall vs. Bralev, 10 Ohio
188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 SW 2d 911; Ward vs.
Smith, 7 Wall 447).
In 1980 Congress passed among other things Public Law 96-221,
providing for the furtherance and expansion of the profligate re-hypothecated
debt pyramid scheme and reduced the reserve requirements on “transaction