Page 24 - Fruits from a Poisonous Tree
P. 24

8      Fruit from a Poisonous Tree

                                All the confusion over an eighty-page Act then is exponentially
                            compounded now by the current ten thousand-plus page Internal Revenue
                            Code 26 USC, along with more than thirty thousand pages of implementing
                            Internal Revenue regulations – 26 CFR and some borrowed from 27 CFR. It
                            is now practically impossible for citizens to keep track of government’s latest
                            edicts.
                                Today the law has become a tool with which to force people to behave in
                            ways politicians approve, which is politically correct, rather than a clear line
                            that citizens can respect in order to live their lives in privacy and peace.
                                With the proliferation of retroactive regulations, government
                            agencies now have the right to change the rules of the game at any
                            time, even after the game is over.
                                The “Rule of John Ashcroft,” whereby federal officials on a whim create
                            new rules to bind and penalize private citizens, has replaced the Rule of Law
                            – the classical concept endorsed by the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780
                            as a restraint on government power.
                                Each night we are deluged with “cop” shows that reveal how far out of
                            its box the beast of government has crawled. Government agents dressed
                            like military commandos wearing black jumpsuits, bulletproof vests and
                            armament that would give a seasoned military force pause to reflect, wear full
                            head masks to conceal their identity. No one busy doing the constitutional
                            work of the Republic needs to wear ski masks concealing their identity.
                            Criminals and outlaws wear masks, not constitutional officers. They bash in
                            doors and throw the inhabitants to the floor, screaming children watching in
                            horror as their parents are manacled and dragged off to prison.
                                The government is supposed to set the example that we the citizens are
                            required to emulate. When the government breaks the law, then there exists
                            no law. We have anarchy. That, I am afraid, is the state of the union as of
                            today.
                                In the famous Supreme Court case of Elkins Et Al v. United States, 364
                            U.S. 206, the Court, reinforcing judicial integrity, stated:
                                “In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled
                            if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent,
                            the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches the whole people by its
                            example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it
                            breeds contempt for law, it invites every man to become a law unto himself,
                            and it invites anarchy.”
                                The time in which Justice Brandeis spoke was a simpler time, and the
                            government had not broken the chains with which the Constitution bound it
                            down. Unfortunately, the federal judiciary has opted out of the Separation of
                            Powers doctrine of the Constitution, and now has become self-regulating.
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29