Page 84 - Fruits from a Poisonous Tree

68 Fruit from a Poisonous Tree

The charging party is instructed to mail the discharge instrument to the
Secretary of Transportation. Title 46 has sufficient evidence to support the
proposition that the Secretary is the trustee over some or all vessels mortgaged
by the United States. If your debtor PERSON is presumed to be a vessel, it is
regulated by the Secretary of Transportation through the Maritime Ministries
Administration; that is the proper party to assist in processing your non-cash
item. The Secretary of Transportation can forward the item to the Secretary
of the Treasury, who already has been notified to prepare for non-cash activity
in your treasury direct account on the Bill of Exchange.
The Secretary of the Treasury is directly related to the Federal Reserve.
Between the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, your non-cash item can be
directed to the proper parties to settle the account and get everyone into that
quid pro quo position we want.
The United States and its co-business partners are debtors to you. You are
the creditor, not only over your debtor PERSON, but also over the United
States, the legal titleholder over the registered things to which you are the
equitable titleholder. You are the primary creditor, so if the United States has
other creditors, like the international bankers, they cannot jump to the front
of the line. Their claims are subordinated to your claims if your claims are
registered and if you understand the law surrounding what you are doing.
Now that you have a better understanding of the “person” (mask) and
“contract” and “jurisdiction” let’s get back to the issue of sovereignty.
It is important to differentiate between sovereign power and unalienable
rights. Sovereign power is subject to nothing, except what the sovereign
expressly agrees to or consents may be done. Unalienable rights are simply
those rights which cannot be taken away as they are deemed to be God-given
and fundamental, without which no civilized society can exist, but they may
be waived.
In this context it may be understood how the people may remain
sovereign, even in the area where the federal government exercises its
sovereign jurisdiction. By consent or by waiver, the people may be
without those fundamental rights, as in those Federal jurisdictions; at
least it appears that the federal government operates on that ideology.
(Hooven v. Evatt, 324 US 652, 671-672)
Although there might be some waiver of rights, it is impossible to convert
the natural born (sovereign) Citizen of this country into a subject (person) of
his government. (M’Ilvaine v. Coke’s Lessee, 8 US 209)
The framers acknowledged that the proposed Constitution for the united
States of America was to be a document of “We the People,” not of the States.
It was to become a compact that provided for the people to be its beneficiaries