Page 108 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 108

will  suffer  higher  numbers  of  hospitalizations  and  numbers  of
                deaths.   [108]   A  consensus  has  formed  in  the  medical  and  public

                community that there is a synergistic effect between air pollution
                exposure and the possible occurrence of COVID-19, and a worse
                outcome when the virus does strike. The research, still embryonic
                but  expanding  fast,  hasn’t  proved  yet  that  a  link  of  causation

                exists, but it unambiguously exposes a strong correlation between
                air pollution and the spread of the coronavirus and its severity. It
                seems  that  air  pollution  in  general,  and  the  concentration  of

                particulate matter in particular, impair the airways – the lungs’ first
                line of defence – meaning that people (irrespective of their age)
                who live in highly polluted cities will face a greater risk of catching
                COVID-19  and  dying  from  it.  This  may  explain  why  people  in
                Lombardy  (one  of  Europe’s  most  polluted  regions)  who  had

                contracted the virus were shown to be twice as likely to die from
                COVID-19 than people almost anywhere else in Italy.


                     1.5.1.3. Lockdown and carbon emissions



                     It  is  too  early  to  define  the  amount  by  which  global  carbon
                dioxide  emissions  will  fall  in  2020,  but  the  International  Energy
                Agency  (IEA)  estimates  in  its  Global  Energy  Review  2020  that
                they will fall by 8%.     [109]  Even though this figure would correspond

                to  the  largest  annual  reduction  on  record,  it  is  still  miniscule
                compared to the size of the problem and it remains inferior to the
                annual reduction in emissions of 7.6% over the next decade that
                the UN thinks is necessary to hold the global rise in temperatures

                below 1.5°C.     [110]


                     Considering the severity of the lockdowns, the 8% figure looks
                rather  disappointing.  It  seems  to  suggest  that  small  individual
                actions (consuming much less, not using our cars and not flying)
                are of little significance when compared to the size of emissions

                generated  by  electricity,  agriculture  and  industry,  the  “big-ticket
                emitters” that continued to operate during the lockdowns (with the
                partial exception of some industries). What it also reveals is that

                the biggest “offenders” in terms of carbon emissions aren’t always
                those  often  perceived  as  the  obvious  culprits.  A  recent
                sustainability  report  shows  that  the  total  carbon  emissions




                                                          107
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113