Page 267 - Trump Executive Orders 2017-2021
P. 267

9970         Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2018 / Presidential Documents


                          (iii) date of entry on active duty under R.C.M. 204.
                       (C) Government appeals. If notice of appeal under RC.M. 908 is filed, a new 120-day
                 time period under this rule shall begin, for all charges neither proceeded on nor severed under
                 R.C.M. 908(b )(4), on the date of notice to the parties under RC.M. 908(b )(8) or 908(c)(3),
                 unless it is determined that the appeal was filed solely for the purpose of delay with the
                 knowledge that it was totally frivolous and without merit. After the decision of the Comi of
                 Criminal Appeals under R.C.M. 908, if there is a further appeal to the Court of Appeals for the
                 Armed Forces or, subsequently, to the Supreme Court, a new 120-day time period under this rule
                 shall begin on the date the parties are notified of the final decision of the Court of Appeals for
                 the Armed Forces, or, if appropriate, the Supreme Court.
                       (D) Rehearings. If a rehearing is ordered or authorized by an appellate court, a new 120-
                 day time period under this rule shall begin on the date that the responsible convening authority
                 receives the record oftrial and the opinion authorizing or directing a rehearing. An accused is
                 brought to trial within the meaning of this rule at the time of arraignment under R.C.M. 904 or,
                 if arraignment is not required (such as in the case of a sentence-only rehearing), at the time of
                 the first session underR.C.M. 803.
                       (E) Commilment qfthe incompetent accused.  Ifthe accused is committed to the custody of
                 the Attorney General for hospitalization as provided in R.C.M. 909(1), all  periods of such
                 commitment shall be excluded when determining whether the period in subsection (a) of this rule
                 has run.  If, at the end of the period of commitment, the accused is returned to the custody of the
                 general court-martial convening authority, a new 120-day time period under this rule shall begin
                 on the date of such return to custody.
                 (c) EYcludable delay.  All pe1iods of time during which appellate courts have issued stays in the
                 proceedings, or the accused is absent without authority, or the accused is hospitalized due to
                 incompetence, or is otherwise in the custody of the Attorney General, shall be excluded when
                 determining whether the period in subsection (a) of this rule has run. All other pretrial delays
                 approved by a military judge or the convening authority shall be similarly excluded.
                    (1) Procedure. Prior to referral, all requests tor pretrial delay, together with supporting
                 reasons, will be submitted to the convening authority or, if authorized under ref,ll.Ilations
                 prescribed by the Secretary concerned, to a military judge for resolution. After referral, such
                 requests for pretrial delay will be submitted to the military judge for resolution.
                    (2) Motions. Upon accused's timely motion to a military judge under R.C.M. 905 for speedy
                 trial relief, counsel should provide the court a chronology detailing the processing of the case.
                 This chronology should be made a part of the appellate record.
                 (d) Remedy. A failure to comply with this rule will result in dismissal of the affected charges, or,
                 in a sentence-only rehearing, sentence relief as appropriate.
                    (1) Dismissal. Dismissal will be with or without prejudice to the government's right to
                 reinstitute court-martial proceedings against the accused for the same offense at a later date.
                 The charges must be dismissed with prejudice where the accused has been deprived of his or
                 her constitutional right to a speedy trial. In determining whether to dismiss charges with or
                 without prejudice, the court shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: the
                 seriousness of the offense; the facts and circumstances of the case that lead to dismissal; the
                 impact of are-prosecution on the administration of justice; and any prejudice to the accused
                 resulting from the denial of a speedy trial.
                    (2) Sentence relief In determining whether or how much sentence relief is appropriate, the
     sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS  VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:39 Mar 07, 2018  Jkt 244001  PO 00000  Frm 00084  Fmt 4705 65  Sfmt 4790  E:\FR\FM\08MRE0.SGM  08MRE0  ER08MR18.086</GPH>
                 military judge shall consider, among others, each of the following factors: the length of the
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272