Page 355 - Trump Executive Orders 2017-2021
P. 355

10058        Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2018 / Presidential Documents


                 accordance with the standards set forth in Article 66(b )(1) and the rules prescribed under
                 Article 66(h).
                 (d) Timeliness. In order for an appeal under subsection (c) to be timely, it must be filed in
                 accordance with Article 66(c) and the rules prescribed under Article 66(h).
                 (e) Action on cases reviewed by a Court of Criminal Appeals.
                    (1) Fmwarding by the Judge Advocate General to the Court of Appeal5for the Armed
                 Forces.  The Judge Advocate General may forward the decision of the Court of Criminal
                 Appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for review with respect to any matter of
                 law. In such a case, the Judge Advocate General shall cause a copy of the decision of the
                 Court of Criminal Appeals and the order forwarding the case to be served on the accused and
                 on appellate defense counsel. While a review of a fonvarded case is pending, the Secretary
                 concerned may defer further service of a sentence to confinement that has been ordered
                 executed in  such a case.
                    (2) Action when sentence is set aside.  In a case reviewed by it under this rule in which the
                 Court of Criminal Appeals has set aside the sentence and which is not forwarded to the Court
                 of Appeals for the Anned Forces under paragraph (e)(l), the Judge Advocate General shall
                 instruct an appropriate authority to modify the judgment in accordance with the decision of
                 the Court of Criminal Appeals. Tfthe Court of Criminal  Appeals has ordered a rehearing on
                 sentence, the record shall be sent to an appropriate convening authority. If that convening
                 authority finds a rehearing impracticable that convening authority may order that a sentence of
                 no punishment be imposed.
                    (3) Action when sentence is affirmed in whole or part.
                       (A) Sentence requiring approval by the President. If the Court of Criminal Appeals
                 affirms any sentence which includes death, the Judge Advocate General shall transmit the record
                 of trial and the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals directly to the Court of Appeals for the
                 Armed Forces when any period for reconsideration provided by the rules of the Courts of
                 Criminal Appeals has expired.
                       (B) Other cases.  If the Court of Criminal Appeals affirms any sentence other than one
                 which includes death, the Judge Advocate General shall cause a copy of the decision of the Court
                 of Criminal Appeals to be served on the accused in accordance with subsection (t).
                    (4) Remission or suspension. If the Judge Advocate General believes that a sentence as
                 aff:J.nned by the Court of Criminal Appeals, other than one which includes death, should be
                 remitted or suspended in whole or part, the Judge Advocate General may, before taking action
                 under paragraphs (e)(l) or (3), transmit the record oftrial and the decision of the Court of
                 Criminal Appeals to the Secretary concerned with a recommendation for action under Article 74
                 or may take such action as may be authorized by the Secretary concerned under Article 74(a).
                    (5) Action when accused lacks mental capacity. In a review conducted under subsection (b) or
                 (c), the Court of Criminal Appeals may not affirm the proceedings w·hile the accused lacks
                 mental capacity to understand and to conduct or cooperate intelligently in the appellate
                 proceedings. In the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, the accused is presumed to
                 have the capacity to understand and to conduct or cooperate intelligently in the appellate
                 proceedings. If a substantial question is raised as to the requisite mental capacity of the accused,
                 the Court of Criminal Appeals may direct an examination of the accused in accordance with
                 R.C.M. 706, but the examination may be limited to determining the accused's present capacity to
                 understand and cooperate in the appellate proceedings. The Court may further order a remand
     sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS  VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:39 Mar 07, 2018  Jkt 244001  PO 00000  Frm 00172  Fmt 4705  Sfmt 4790  E:\FR\FM\08MRE0.SGM  08MRE0  ER08MR18.174</GPH>
                 under R.C.M. 810(f) as may be necessary. If the record is thereafter returned to the Court of


                                                             153
   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360