Page 231 - Law of Peace, Volume ,
P. 231

Pam 27-161-1

            common law  have  been  added.  The Code of  Criminal   followed by lower courts until the former changes its own previous view.
            Procedure incorporates such Anglo-American features as   Thus, the courts develop "case  law"  in many  fields of  criminal law,
                                                                 although law-making  authority  by  courts  has  never  been  explicitly
            the
                                                                'recognized in Japanese jurisprudence and judicial opinions are always
            requirement of ajudicial warrant for every kind of compulsory measure,
                                                                 based on the words of statutes and not on precedents. 12s
            the proceeding for the indication of reasons for detention, restrictions
            on the use of evidence, . . . the increased use of the adversary party con-   c.  Rights of  the Accused. In  addition to the common
            cept in the structure of public trial [, . . . the] abolition of the preliminary   law features in the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal
            proceeding, the basic revision of the system of appeals, the prohibition   Procedure, the Japanese Constitution of  1946 contains a
            against reopening the proceedings to the detriment of the accused, the   number of "American-type"  rights which are considered
            restrictions placed  on  the  system of  summary proceedings,  and  the
            abolition of  private actions collateral to public prosecutions. Details of   basic to defendants, e.g.:
            procedure are provided by  rule of court. 124        due process, arrest, search and seizure, fair and speedy trial, confronta-
                                                                 tion  of  witnesses,  right  to  counsel,  coerced confession,  and  double
            The Japanese Penal Code retains its basic framework even
                                                                 jeopardy. 126
            though originally enacted in 1907. It has stood the test of
                                                                   d.  Conclusion. Japan  has  blended  the  precepts  of
            time because it has provided the courts with flexibility by
                                                                 oriental law, civil law, and the common law and has at-
            defining offenses broadly. Further, Japanese courts
                                                                 tained a rather unique criminal legal system.
            are vested with a broad discretion in applying Code norms to individual
            cases, and judicial  interpretations by  the highest court . . . are usually
                                                                    125.  Suzuki, The Politics ofCriminal Law Reform: Japan, 21 Am J.
               124.  S.  Dano,  Japanese Criminal Procedure  17,  18  (George ed.   Comp. L. 287, 294 (1973).
            1965).                                                  126.  Id. at 287, citing Japanese Constitution Arts. 31, 33-35, 37-39.
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232