Page 86 - Law of Peace, Volume ,
P. 86

Pam 27-161-1

            included in the territorial sea or in the internal waters of a State.   (3) Where the coasts of two States are opposite or adjacent to each
              Art. 2. The high seas being open to all nations, no State may validly   other, neither of  the two States is entitled, failing agreement between
            purport to subject any part of them its sovereignty. Freedom of the high   them to the contrary, to extend its contiguous zone beyond the median
            seas is  exercised  udder  the  conditions laid  down  by  this  article and   line every point of which is equidistant from the nearest points on the
            by  the  other  rules  of  international  law.  It  comprises,  inter   baselines from which the breadth of the territorial seas of the two States
            alia, both for coastal and non-coastal States:       is measured.
              (1) Freedom of navigation;                           The exercise of jurisdiction  in  contiguous zones of  the  high  seas
              (2) Freedom of fishing;                            becomes necessary in view of the inadequacy under modem conditions
              (3) Freedom to lay submarine cables and pipelines;   of any reasonable breadth of territorial waters; whatever we  may regard
              (4) Freedom to fly over the high seas.             as the breadth of  marginal sea now accepted under international law,
              These freedoms, and others which are recognized by the general prin-   there are occasions and purposes for which jurisdiction must be exer-
            ciples of international law, shall be exercised by  all States with reasona-   cised  farther out from shore. This differs from an attempt to declare
            ble regard to the interests of other States in their exercise of the freedom   such areas temtorial waters subject to the full sovereignty of the coastal
            of the high seas.                                    state. 200
              Art.  22.  (1)  Except where acts of interference derive from powers
            conferred by treaty, a warship which encounters a foreign merchant ship   4-20.  Comment on Materials Presented. As indicated in
            on the high seas is not justified in boarding her unless there is reasona-  the opening paragraph of this section, no attempt has been
            ble ground for suspecting:                           made to examine fully the vast and rather complex area of
               (a) That the ship is engaged in piracy;  or       the Law of the Sea. Instead, attention has been focused on
               (b) That the ship is engaged in the slave trade; or   those concepts which the &tary  attorney is most likely to
               (c) That, though flying a foreign flag or refusing to show its flag,
            the ship is, in reality, of the same nationality as the warship.   have. occasion to  apply in the field: jurisdictional norms
              (2) In the cases provided for in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) above,   applicable to vessels and persons thereon. This chapter has
            the warship may proceed to verify the ship's right to fly its flag. To this   dealt with one of the most significant, as well as substan-
            end,  it  may  send  a  boat  under  the  command  of  an  officer to  the   tive, aspects of public international .law: the various juris-
            suspected ship.  If  suspicion remains after  the  documents have  ben   dictional theories  by  which  states exercise control over
            checked, it may proceed to a further examination on board the ship,
            which must be carried out with all possible consideration.   territory,  individuals,  and  events. The  necessity for  a
              (3)  If the suspicions prove to be unfounded, and provided that the ship   thorough analysis and comprehension of this area of the
            boarded has not committed any act justifying them, it shall be compen-   law  is  evident.  While  emphasis  has  been  placed
            sated for any loss or damage that may have been sustained.   throughout this chapter on the right of state to control in-
                 CONVENTION ON THE TERRITORIAL SEA AND 
         dividuals and activities under its jurisdiction, there do ex-
                          THE CONTIGUOUS ZONE 
                  ist instances where a state, its agents, and instrumentalities
                            Geneva, April 28, 1958 
             have an international right to immunity from the exercise
                   15 U.S.T.  1606, T.I.A.S.  5639, 516 U.N.T.S.  205
                                                                 ofjurisdiction over both their actions and property. An in-
             Art.24. (1) In a zone of the high seas contiguous to its territorial sea,
            the coastal State may exercise the control necessary to:   creasingly important aspect of international jurisprudence,
               (a)  Prevent infringement of  its  customs,  fiscal,  immigration  or   these jurisdictional immunities are the subject of chapter
            sanitary regulations within its territory or territorial sea;   5,  irlfra.
               (b) Punish infringement of the above regulations committed within
            its temtory or territorial sea.                         200. Bishop,  The Exercise  of Jurisdiction for  Special Purposes  in
              (2) The contiguous zone may not extend beyond twelve miles from   High Seas Beyond the Outer Limit of Territorial Waters, reprinted in 99
            the base lie from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.   CONC.REC.2493 (1953).
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91