Page 15 - November 2019 BarJournal
P. 15

BUSINESS LITAGATION                    FEATURE





            Products Liability Litigation, 279 F.R.D. 447,   Attorneys should not, however, believe   productions text-searchable by preserving
            449 S.D.Ohio (2012). The  problem with   they satisfy Civ.R. 34’s “reasonably useable”   extracted or OCR text in separate TXT files
            this solution—beyond the fact that most   requirement merely by producing all ESI   corresponding to the images. One also can
            attorneys find native ESI to be impractical   that can be imaged in PDF or TIFF. At a   make productions metadata-searchable by
            to work with or present as evidence—is   minimum, a “reasonably useable” imaged   preserving relevant metadata in a separate
            that often one cannot segregate the relevant   production must substantially preserve the   index. Typically, a metadata index is
            information  from  irrelevant,  sensitive,  or   formatting (i.e. appearance) of the native ESI.   produced  as  a  DAT  or  CSV  load  file  and
            privileged information without converting   This means one should image ESI directly   lists each document by Bates-number(s),
            the ESI into a non-native form. So although   from native ESI and not from a degraded   custodian(s) or source(s), and, as available,
            producing all ESI in native may satisfy   intermediate form, such as a re-scanned   its: email subject, sender, and recipients;
            Civ.R. 34(B), attorneys and courts should   hardcopy  printout. The images also should   date and time sent, created, or modified; file
            consider it a solution of last resort because   be “logically unitized,” such that each PDF   name, extension, and path; and hash value.
            it risks infringing the responding party’s   image reflects a separate document or, if   Critically for Civ.R. 34’s “reasonably
            rights and obligations beyond Civ.R. 34.   rendered into single-page TIFFs, the first and   useable” requirement, the receiving party
            Accord Fasteners for Retail, Inc. v. DeJohn,   last page of each document are preserved in a   needs no specialized software to use imaged
            2014-Ohio-1729 (8th Dist.) (holding   corresponding “load file.”       productions made with these specifications.
            that an order compelling production of   Moreover, if the native ESI is searchable   For example, one can quickly scroll through
            ESI in a manner that risked disclosing   by text or metadata, the imaged production   a TIFF production using Windows File
            privileged and confidential information   should  be  searchable  by  text  or  metadata   Explorer with its “Extra Large Icons” and
            was immediately appealable and abused the   too.  See  2006  Staff  Notes,  Fed.R.Civ.P.  34.   “Preview Pane” options activated. One can
            court’s discretion).               One can make individual PDF images text-  use File Explorer’s search to run text searches
                                               searchable during the imaging process or   across an entire production if TXT files are
            When producing ESI in non-native form,   by  running  optical  character recognition   produced. One can search DAT and CSV
            attorneys should preserve the appearance   (OCR). Alternatively, one can make entire   indexes in Windows Notepad or, with some
            and searchability of the native ESI.
            Most attorneys produce ESI in static-image
            form (e.g. PDF or TIFF/JPG), with select ESI
            produced in native or near-native form only
            as necessary. Imaged productions minimize
            the practical and legal complications           In litigation, if you aren’t
            associated with native ESI and, if not more
            difficult to use than the native ESI, also   thinking three steps ahead,
            can satisfy Civ.R. 34(B)(3). Thus, imaged
            productions are the “default standard” for        you’re already behind.
            courts  in  the  Northern  District  of  Ohio
            and are acceptable throughout Ohio.  See            Our litigators foresee issues before
            N.D.Ohio Local Rules, Appendix K, §6                     they become problems.
            (requiring parties to produce ESI only as
            image files with original formatting and
            metadata preserved unless “particularized
            need” is shown for native files); see also In
            re Porsche, 279 F.R.D. at 449 footnote 5 (“if
            the requesting party does not specify a form,
            the producing party is within its right to
            produce the ESI in static image form[...]”).
              Most common ESI types can be imaged.
            Emails, word processing files, native PDFs,
            slide presentations, photos, and text messages
            are examples of ESI amenable to imaging.
            ESI that cannot be imaged but that should
            be produced in native or near-native form
            include videos, audio files, and 3D drawings.
            Electronic spreadsheets, database ESI,
            websites, and unusual ESI types may or may   FrantzWard.com
            not be imageable and should be handled on
            a case-by-case basis.
                                                 FW017_ClvlndBrJrnl_LitAd_4.77x4.91_101817.indd   1      10/18/17   9:30 AM
              NOVEMBER 2019                                                            CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR JOURNAL  | 15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20