Page 114 - Ming_China_Courts_and_Contacts_1400_1450 Craig lunas
P. 114

the ‘Western City Feast’ which appears in his collected   during the mid-Ming dynasty, but it is not on par with the
          works Dongli wenji 東里文集 (Collected Works of Yang   degree of political advantage that Jiangxi officials enjoyed as
               18
          Shiqi).  But because no painter was in attendance on this   expressed in the Elegant Gathering in the Apricot Garden of 1437.
          occasion, we have no pictorial documentation of the event.   If we understand the Elegant Gathering in the Apricot Garden
          We can see, however, that the foundation for Yang Shiqi’s   as an image of political power in 1437, how do we then
          official power, based on a network of Jiangxi natives, had   understand the presence of the painter Xie Huan? Xie Huan
          been established as early as 1404 among officials who passed   hailed from Zhejiang, not Jiangxi. His appearance at the
          the jinshi examination in that year. Not only did this   scene is intriguing. The two painters who worked on the
          grouping participate in the ‘Western City Feast’, but a   1499 scroll Birthday Gathering in the Bamboo Garden, Lü
          portion of them were also in attendance at the Apricot   Wenying 呂文英 (1421–1505) and Lü Ji 呂紀 (b. 1477), were
          Garden gathering over three decades later. These two   likewise from Zhejiang. It is known that Xie Huan and Yang
          gatherings both included a prominent number of Jiangxi   Shiqi shared an amicable relationship; the bridge between
          1404 jinshi officials.                            them was the Zhejiang official Huang Huai. During the
            In 1402, after the Yongle emperor defeated the Jianwen   years 1403 to 1414, Huang Huai occupied a similar post to
          建文 emperor (r. 1399–1402) and captured Nanjing, the   Yang Shiqi and other Jiangxi officials as mentor to the
          structure and composition of the bureaucracy saw great   imperial princes, Zhu Gaochi 朱高熾 (1378–1425) (later the
          changes. A Jiangxi network gradually came to replace the   Hongxi emperor) and the imperial grandson Zhu Zhanji
          Zhejiang grouping of officials. During Zhu Yuanzhang’s    朱瞻基 (1398–1435) (the Xuande emperor).  Huang Huai
                                                                                              20
          朱元璋 (1328–98) time, military officials were drawn mostly   was also from Yongjia 永嘉 county, the same home locality
          from Anhui province, while civil officials came mostly from   as Xie Huan. According to research by the Wenzhou-based
          Zhejiang. Initially the cultured landlords of Jiangsu were   scholar Zhang Ruyuan 張如元, it was Huang Huai who
          excluded from power because of their relationship to Zhang   recommended Xie Huan to the court, where he achieved
          Shicheng 張士誠 (1321–67), a rival of the Ming founder, but   fame as a professional painter.  Yang Shiqi was himself not a
                                                                                    21
          this began to change in the mid to late Ming dynasty. The   jinshi holder, but rather he came to court via introductions
          Zhejiang connection had Song Lian 宋濂 (1310–81) and Liu   and recommendations (as was still possible in the very early
          Ji 劉基 (1311–75) as its chief representatives, so that officials   Ming), in the same manner as Xie Huan. The man who first
          from this province were heavily affected by their fall from   recommended Yang Shiqi was not, in fact, from Jiangxi. His
          power. During the Jianwen reign, Song Lian’s student (and   recommender Wang Shuqying 王叔英 (d. 1402) hailed from
          also a Zhejiang native) Fang Xiaoru 方孝孺 (1357–1402) was   Zhejiang and was a close friend of the distinguished
          employed by the emperor himself, and became a symbol of   Zhejiang scholar and official (and martyr in the cause of the
          the spirit of civil officialdom. After 1402, with the exception   Jianwen emperor) Fang Xiaoru. Importantly, this proves
          of Huang Huai 黃淮 (1367–1449, from Zhejiang) and Yang   that Yang Shiqi had a close relationship to the Zhejiang
          Rong (from Fujian), the remaining five Grand Secretariat   cohort of officials from the very beginning of his career.
          officials were all from Jiangxi: Xie Jin 謝縉 (1369–1415),   Huang Huai was thus an important link between the
          Yang Shiqi, Jin Youzi 金幼孜 (1367–1431), Hu Yan 胡儼   Jiangxi officials and the Zhejiang painter. He maintained a
          (1360–1443) and Hu Guang. In the 42 years between 1402   close relationship with the cohort of Jiangxi officials until
          and 1444, the year that Yang Shiqi passed away, with the   1427, when he retired to the Zhejiang countryside in his
          exception of Yang Rong’s six years as Senior Grand   native Yongjia. On the eve of his departure from Beijing, the
          Secretary (Shou fu 首輔), the three Jiangxi natives Xie Jin,   Jiangxi officials Yang Shiqi, Zeng Qi and Wang Ying sent
                                                                                           23
          Hu Guang and Yang Shiqi successively served as Senior   poems commemorating his departure,  and in honour of
          Grand Secretary. We could therefore say that the   the blossoming lotus flowers in front of his home, another of
          configuration of official power during the Yongle reign was   the Jiangxi officials, Wang Zhi, composed the Preface to Poem
          dominated by the Jiangxi lineage but with weaker Fujian   of Auspicious Lotuses (Ruilian shi xu 瑞蓮詩序).  As further
                                                                                               24
          and Zhejiang elements.                            testimony to the closeness of their relationship, in 1440
            Beginning in the Yongle reign, the Jiangxi official   Huang Huai also composed a preface for Yang Shiqi’s
          network started to achieve political dominance, and at the   collected writings,  and when Yang Shiqi passed away in
                                                                           25
          same time its members also asserted influence on the literary   1444, it was Huang Huai who wrote his funerary
          arts with the so-called ‘cabinet style’ (taige ti 臺閣體) of poetic   inscription.  Not only did Huang Huai endorse Xie Huan at
                                                                     26
          verse, which originated in the Jiangxi literary circles with   court, he recommended other Zhejiang painters, Guo Chun
          Yang Shiqi as its archetypal practitioner (see discussions by   郭純 (1370–1444)  and Hu Zongyun 胡宗蘊,  to court as
                                                                          27
                                                                                                28
          David Robinson and Peter Ditmanson in Chapters 1 and 10   painters and calligraphers; he also recommended the
          of this volume). But Jiangxi officials never took the lead in   painter Chen Zongyuan 陳宗淵 (b. 1370),  from Tiantai
                                                                                             29
          calligraphic or painting styles.  Conversely, although   天台 county in Zhejiang, for an official post in the Hanlin
                                  19
          scholar officials in the Northern Song dynasty (960–1127),   Academy. Guo Chun and Yang Shiqi are known to have had
          such as Su Shi 蘇軾 (1037–1101), never attained political   interactions, a fact that is testified to by Yang Shiqi’s record
          dominance in their day, their place at the forefront of   of his visit to Guo Chun’s studio, the ‘humble hut’ (Pu zhai
          literature, calligraphy and painting is recognised by   樸齋).
                                                                 30
          posterity. A later scroll, the Gathering of Five who are Alike (Wu   There is one more Zhejiang scholar official who must be
          tong hui tu) dated 1503 in the Palace Museum, Beijing, reflects   mentioned in this context, as previous art historians have yet
          the partial dominance of officials from the Jiangsu region   to discuss him – this is Jiang Ji 蔣驥 (1378–1430), a consistent



          104 | Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119