Page 183 - China's Renaissance in Bronze, The Robert H.CIague Collection of Later Chinese Bronzes 1100-1900
P. 183

5
      of the David Collection type.  At the same time, the Clague vase  represents
      Yongzheng  antiquarianism  at  work  in  bringing the  shape  and  proportions
      of  the  standard  temple  vase  into  conformity  with  those  of  Bronze  Age
      zun;  it  combines  elements  from  standard  temple  vases  with  ones  from
      late  Shang  bronze  zun  and  with  ones  from  Kangxi-period  baluster  vases. 6
      The  vessel  thus  harmonizes  not  only  with  the  ancient  bronze-style  decor
      with which  it  is ornamented  but with  d/ng-shaped  censers  of the type  with
      which it was probably  used.  Eighteenth-century  ceramic counterparts to the
      Clague  vase  are  rare,  but  a  late  Kangxi  cobalt-blue  glazed  vessel  in  the
      Museum   of  Fine Arts,  Boston,  has  an ovoid  body  with  a related  ring  on  its
      inclined shoulder, providing a context for the Clague vase. 7  In contrast, a  blue-
      and-white presentation vase dated to 1740 and formerly  in the Laurent  Heliot
      Collection,  Paris,  illustrates  the  more  mannered  interpretation  charac-
      teristic  of the  Qianlong  period. 8
            The size, symmetrical decor, and balanced shape with clearly  defined
      units imbue this vase with a monumentality  unknown  in bronzes of the  Kangxi
      era.  Like the  calligraphy  of  its  mark, the  vase  reflects  a self-confident  new
      style,  at  once  powerful  and  mature,  restrained  and  appealing.  The  style
      reflects  a keen interest  in antiquity, yet  it avoids the slavish imitation that  is
      the  bane  of  many  archaistic  bronzes;  thus,  it  borrows  taotie  masks,  kui
      dragons, triangular  lappets,  and  leiwen  grounds from  ancient  bronzes,  but
      combines  them  in  a  new  and  fanciful  way  with  strapwork  dragons  that
      have  more  to  do  with  Kangxi  white  jade  amulets 9  than  with  antiquity.
      Meticulously  wrought,  the  intricate  leiwen  patterns  represent  a turn  away
      from the subtly textured grounds  of the Kangxi era, reflecting the  influence
      not only of late Shang bronzes  but of contemporaneous  carved red  lacquer,
      the  latter  a trend  that  would  become  even  more  pronounced  during  the
      Qianlong  era  [see 39]. The  very  dark  coating  applied to the  leiwen  ground
      may also  reflect  influence  of the  lacquer tradition,  since  eighteenth-century
      carved  red  lacquers  sometimes  feature  their  relief  ornaments  against  a
      diapered  black  lacquer  ground. 10
            This  heavy  vase  is so  perfectly  finished that  it  is difficult to  ascertain
      whether  it was  integrally  cast  as  a single  unit  or whether  it was  cast  in two
      or three  sections.  The  rings  and  their  supporting  escutcheons  were  sepa-
       rately  cast  and  affixed. The  principal  decorative  motifs  were  likely  cast  in
       relief  but articulation of detail was cold worked. The six-character  reign  mark
      was  integrally  cast,  but  the  two  characters  on the  lip were  cold  worked.
      The  base was  separately  prepared  and  inset.




                                     T I I E  R O B E R T  II.  C L A G U E  C O L L E C T I O N  1 7 9
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188