Page 40 - Chiense TExtiles, MET MUSEUM Pub 1934
P. 40

THE  METROPOLITAN  MUSEUM  OF  ART
                   silk thread was subsequently evolved by the Chinese and
                   the resulting gold  thread is  more practical for  weaving
                   large patterns  and  for  embroidering than  the  flat  gold
                   strips, but both are still used lavish\ y.
                     Several  small  pieces  of brocade in  the  collection  are
                   unquestionably Ming, but since we have not yet had an
                   opportunity to study them thoroughly we prefer not to
           /1
                   publish them here.
                     A number of eighteenth-century brocade court robes  7
                   make  a  colorful  group  with  their  rich  gold  designs
                   against clear colors of every shade. The gold here is  of
                   both  kinds  mentioned  above,  the  flat-paper  variety  be-
                   ing used  only for  the faint  outlining of colors  and  the
                   thread gold for the large dragon motives. One very rich
                   court robe in the Paul Bequest has the entire design of
                   dragons,  bats,  fretwork,  clouds,  and  waves  in  thread
                   gold woven on a brown satin ground.
                     One of the earliest pieces  of k' o ssu in the Museum
                  collection  (except  for  pictorial  examples  mounted  as
                  kakemono,  which  we  have  not included  in  this  study
                  because of their closer relation to paintings) is the small
                                        8
                  panel shown in figure  1. This piece has the firm ribbed
                   7   Notably  those  in  the  collection  of  Dr.  John  W.  Hammond,
                  now on loan in  the Museum.
                   8  This is  a substitution for  the piece  illustrated  in  the first  edi-
                  tion,  which  we  have  decided  is  probably  Japanese,  although  it
                  was  originally  catalogued  by  Kihei  Hattori,  the  noted  Japanese
                  authority on  textiles from whose  collection it came, as  "probably
                  Chinese."
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45