Page 144 - Vol_2_Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaport Trade
P. 144

Chapter 6
            Fujian and Hizen Ware: A 17th Century
            Evidence of the Manila Galleon Trade
            Found from Selected Archaeological
            Sites in the Philippines



            Nida T. Cuevas





            Glazed ceramics are important material evidence of maritime contacts and external
            exchanges, which have broadened the understanding of coastal polities
            (Junker 2000: 3), their long-distance trades and maritime relations and interactions
            (Nishimura 2014; Junker 2000). Philippine archaeological sites have yielded Chinese
            trade ceramics dated as early as the 9th century (Beyer 1979: 115), establishing the
            archipelago’s early involvement in external exchanges and contacts (Nishimura 2014;
            Junker 2000; Fox 1979; Lim 1966; Beyer 1979). The Manila Galleons in the 17th
            century heightened external exchanges and intensi!ed contacts subsequently brought
            to the Philippines notable quantities of Chinese, Southeast Asian, and Japanese
            ceramics and other trade items. The historical records have revealed that direct sailing
            from thecoastalcityofQuanzhouin theChinese southeastern province of Fujian inthe
            17th century opened new and shorter trade routes (Lam 2002: 53), and the abundant
            presence of Fujian wares archaeologically found in the country’s major historical sites
            has con!rmed the vibrancy of this trade. This has also been substantiated by the
            presence of Japanese or Hizen wares in the archaeological sites which most often
            associated with Fujian wares.
              Such wares have been uncovered in the shipwrecks of San Diego in Fortune
            Island, Nasugbu, Batangas and San Isidro in Zambales (Dizon and Orillaneda 2007:
            179; Desroches 1997: 300). Land-based sites such as Boljoon in Cebu (Bersales
            and de Leon 2011), PortaVaga site in Cavite City (Tatel 2002), and Mehan Garden
            (Jago-on et al. 2003), Arroceros Forest Park (Katipunan Arkeologistng Pilipinas
            Inc. 2006), and Intramuros sites in Manila also yielded Fujian and Hizen ceramics.
              While scholars have largely studied trade ceramics in the context of under-
            standing external patterns of exchange and commercial links, the examination of the
            relations between material culture and a society’s social strati!cation (i.e. elite and



            N. T. Cuevas (&)
            National Museum of the Philippines, Metro Manila, Philippines
            e-mail: ntc_cuevas@yahoo.com
            © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019                       115
            C. Wu et al. (eds.), Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaports and Early Maritime
            Globalization, The Archaeology of Asia-Paci!c Navigation 2,
            https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9248-2_6
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149