Page 260 - Vol_2_Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaport Trade
P. 260

232                                        P. Fournier and R. Junco Sanchez

            of the indigenous elites who emulated consumer behaviors of those of European
            descent, copied their tastes for Asian commodities and owned porcelain table sets
            (Machuca 2012: 95).
              Beyond the cost, it must be emphasized that to reinforce the identity of the
            individuals and the construction of the subject by purchasing and consuming certain
            kinds of goods to which other people did not have access, the individuals generated
            new social needs. Consequently, the identities of social groups were expressed in
            the possession of various objects. Asian commodities and in our case Chinese
            porcelains as part of the material culture constituted social products, bearers of
            meanings and knowledge that contributed to create society through the actions of
            individuals and to structure the actions of the subjects in their everyday life. Thus,
            this kind of material culture mediates human action and, consequently, porcelain
            objects were manipulated and negotiated in social relations (Dellino-Musgrave
            2006).
              Asian commodities had great impact in Europe and in Spanish domains such as
            New Spain because of their aesthetic values, since they came from distant lands
            where beautiful things were produced, objects worthy of possessing and to incor-
            porate into everyday life. They also represented nexuses with a wide world that was
            within reach and, for some, of their purchasing power, indicators of the fortune of
            their users and worthy of exhibiting in the homes of the economically favored. In
            fact, porcelain pieces that were usually expensive symbolized a positive relation-
            ship with the orb (Brook 2008: 82). These ceramics were a form of exchange both
            cultural and economic that allowed the subjects to experience another culture and
            realize that it existed, in a process that developed the notions of self-identity and the
            otherness (Pierson 2012: 12).
              We may conclude that Asian goods were symbols of status and global taste. Our
            archaeological evidence reflects conspicuous consumption of well-to-do people or
            of those who pretended to be affluent, and to a lesser extent of all members of the
            society of New Spain, deeply divided by rank, social class, blood purity, and skin
            color.



            References


            Abascal, R. (1978). Restos prehispánicos en la Plaza Independencia, Pachuca, Hgo. In
              Historiografía Hidalguense II, Teotlalpan, Memorias del Segundo Simposio (pp. 193–201).
              México: Centro Hidalguense de Investigaciones Históricas, A.C., FONAPAS, num. 10, 11 and
              12. Mexico: Pachuca, Hgo.
            Allende Carrera, A. (1999). Informe técnico de excavación y análisis de materiales del Rescate
              Arqueológico en la Parroquia del Santo Ángel Custodio de Analco. Unpublished report.
              Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Archivo de la Coordinación Nacional
              de Arqueología.
            Bonta de la Pezuela, M. (2008). Porcelana china de exportación para el mercado novohispano: la
              colección del Museo del Virreinato. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas,
              Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265