Page 268 - Vol_2_Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaport Trade
P. 268

14  The Chinese Porcelain from the Port of San Blas, Mexico     241

            hand, the authorities of New Spain and the merchants of the Consulate of
            Merchants of Mexico argued that this arrival would lend itself to contraband,
            especially with the main product of the northern regions, which was silver
            (Cárdenas de la Peña 1968: 129).
              In spite of all this, the certain thing was that this practice was nothing new. The
            merchandises taken to the Jesuit missions in Baja California from the cities of
            Guadalajara and Tepic (through Matanchel near San Blas) were basic products such
            as food or necessary tools in California, Sonora, and Sinaloa, but gradually those
            merchandises also included manufactured goods, establishing incipient exchanges
            that often were not registered by the local authorities; these deals extended and
            increased to Alta California after the founding of San Diego and Monterrey, set-
            tlements that soon established regular deals with both foreigners who arrived in the
            American Northwest as well as with the rest of the viceroyalty through San Blas.
            The booming economy of western New Spain, besides sending more and more
            cargoes by sea to the northern settlements, also led to a demand to receive Asian
            goods directly and not have to wait for them to arrive by land from Acapulco; for
            that reason, the merchants of Guadalajara pressed so that San Blas could work as a
            commercial port and stop of the Manila Galleons (Trejo 1999: 54). On the other
            hand, the presence of other European powers that was spreading throughout the
            Paci!c, forced San Blas to also participate in the exchanges between New Spain
            and the Philippines. When war broke out between Spain and England in 1779, some
            ships of the Maritime Department were sent to accompany and protect the Manila
            Galleon (1780) as well as to send correspondence to the Philippine authorities
            (1779, 1783 and 1785). This situation generated the problem that the ships returned
            loaded with Asian goods that the of!cers and crew were carrying; This situation
            forced authorities to deal with these shipments, which theoretically should not be
            traded in the Maritime Department, so in principle they were sent to Guadalajara
            because there were customs of!cials; nevertheless, this growing practice forced to
            regulate the situation in the port itself (Pinzón Ríos 2011a, b: 337–359). In addition
            to the above, and in the framework of the commercial opening of various port of the
            Spanish empire in 1789, it was ordered that all major and minor ports of New Spain
            be open to long distance commerce, and thus, San Blas began to operate as a
            commercial port (Olveda 2006: 143).
              At the same time that these transformations were generated, the transpaci!c
            route began to have competition because in 1765 direct commercial relations were
            established between the Philippines and Spain through the Cape of Good Hope
            which in 1785 allowed for the creation of the Philippine Trade Company, which
            among its functions could bring Asian goods to different ports, of the American
            territory with the exception of Acapulco, that remained the only place authorized to
            receive the Manila Galleons (Olveda 2006: 143; Alfonso and Shaw 2013: 307–
            339). This situation made it possible for San Blas to receive Asian goods more
            frequently. These links gradually increased and were generally coordinated by the
            merchants of Guadalajara and Tepic who received the shipments and distributed
            them to the West and even to the Northern mining regions, whose money paid for
            such shipments (Ibarra 2000: 117). During the occupation of Acapulco by the
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273