Page 141 - A Re-examination of Late Qing Dynasty Porcelain, 1850-1920 THESIS
P. 141

3.2 Establishing Collecting in China


                          While many scholars have denoted the beginning of collecting in the Western

                   world as the beginning of a porcelain obsession, this study finds that porcelain collecting


                   was not a pastime created by individuals in the Western world.  In fact, this pastime was

                   enjoyed by individuals within China, which is where the earliest records of Chinese


                   porcelain collecting began.  The collecting of porcelain within China laid a foundation

                   that other cultures appropriated and reinterpreted, allowing each culture that acquired


                   Chinese porcelain to shape its own unique collecting practices.  As explored throughout

                   this research, the idea of collecting in China was found earlier within the imperial court


                   and served as a means of projecting authority.  The practices that are now associated with

                   porcelain collecting originated within the context of collecting other art forms, because

                   porcelain had not yet been developed when these collecting practices were established.


                   The scholar Lothar Ledderose has established that collected objects legitimized the

                   emperor and proved undoubtedly that he possessed the mandate of heaven. 173   Collecting


                   in China has a long history, with the earliest documentation of collecting dating to the

                   emperors of the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 AD).  The emperors collected a wide variety


                   of objects including jades, bronzes, and calligraphy. 174   These early pursuits to claim

                   ownership of objects that conveyed a sense of power were recorded in the Zhanguoce 战



                   国策 (Annals of the Warring States) from prior to the second century BCE:



                   173  Lothar Ledderose, “Some Observations on the Imperial Art Collection in China,” Transactions
                   of the Oriental Ceramic Society 43 (1978): 33–46.
                   174  Shelagh Vainker, “Ceramics for Use,” in The British Museum Book of Chinese Art, ed. Jessica
                   Rawson (London: British Museum Press, 1992), 246.

                                                            102
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146