Page 95 - Ming Porcelain Sothebys march 2018
P. 95

AN EXCEPTIONAL XUANDE IMPERIAL
              CLOISONNÉ BOX AND COVER


              ޜኜՙᖵj܁ᅃზߣỻക೗๻ᚂ،ڀ̓೦ᇳ७ႊଷ


              By Regina Krahl   ੰጶё






                                                            mperial cloisonné wares of Xuande mark and period are very rare and this
              ܁ᅃ੿Ⴁỻക೗๻ኜd੭ϋಛ٫dମ੬ᗭ                            covered box appears to be unique. It belongs to a most remarkable and
              ੻d͉ۜһЧމ֘Էd᙮׵ɓᗳ฽ˇԈỻക                         I exceedingly rare group of cloisonné vessels which have the reign mark so
              ೗๻ۜ၇fϤᗳޜԷdϋಛѩᗪ׵ኜԒdፄ                         prominently placed, in plain view, integrated into the overall cloisonné design,
              ׵዆᜗ỻക೗๻७ུʘʕdৰ͉̮ۜdা༱                         but executed in the champlevé technique. Only half a dozen such vessels are
              සʞԷf
                                                          recorded, among them the two most important pieces of Chinese cloisonné
              ʞԷ຅ʕdՇԷމႊଷdɓԷމ෥೐dѩུ                         ware extant.
              ᇳ ː ७dᗪ ܁ ᅃ ಛ ׵७ ུʘගdܝ٫̈І
              Stephen  Winkworth  ϗᔛʿɽၪᅃᐌɻ͸ᙨ              The Xuande mark appears, inscribed in the same way in champlevé technique
              ϗᔛdତɧԷѩ᙮  Pierre  Uldry  ௹ɻޜᔛfԈ             within a cloisonné design, on two cylindrical covered boxes and a circular disc
              Helmut Brinker ʿ Albert LutzdChinese       shaped like the top of such a box, the latter from the collection of Stephen
              Cloisonné  The Pierre Uldry Collection‘d    Winkworth and Sir Percival and Lady David and all three now in the collection
              ࡐ౱d1989ϋdᇜ໮1e2ʿ4dܝ٫̤މ༈ྡ                     of Dr. Pierre Uldry. Each of these pieces is decorated with a large petal-panel
              ፽ᅃ˖و܆ࠦd1985ϋ̈وf                             rosette and foliate scrollwork, with the reign mark cutting across the design
                                                          on top, like on the present piece; see Helmut Brinker & Albert Lutz, Chinese
              ՉቱՇԷމɓ࿁ɽᜦdೌဲ᙮ତπ௰ࠠࠅʘ
              ʕ਷ỻക೗๻ኜf༈࿁ᜦˉʂ၂ɽdʱй᙮                         Cloisonné: The Pierre Uldry Collection, London, 1989, cat. nos 1, 2 and 4,
              Uldry ʿࡐ౱ɽߵ௹ي᎜ϗᔛdۃ٫࠾࢝ᘽኇ                     the latter also illustrated on the cover of the original German version of this
              ˰  Rietberg  Museumd̈ஈΝɪdᇜ໮5i               catalogue, published 1985.
              ܝ٫ྡ༱׵  Harry  Garner  ᐌɻdChinese
              and  Japanese  Cloisonné  Enamels‘dࡐ        The remaining two pieces bearing a Xuande mark in champlevé are
              ౱d1962ϋdྡو12ʿ13dʿࠫ54 55d                    unquestionably the most important pieces of Chinese cloisonné known to be
              Ԩಀ࢝׵׼Ñެಃସ˰ʞɤϋ‘dɽߵ௹                         preserved, the pair of massive jars now split between the Uldry collection and
              ي᎜dࡐ౱d2014ϋdྡ༱׵܆ࠦʿྡ64                       the British Museum, London; for the former, on loan to the Rietberg Museum,
              (ྡɓ) f
                                                          Zurich, see ibid., cat. no. 5; the latter is illustrated and discussed in Sir Harry
                                                          Garner, Chinese and Japanese Cloisonné Enamels, London, 1962, pls. 12
                                                          and 13 and pp. 54-55, and was included in the exhibition Ming. Fifty Years
                                                          that Changed China, The British Museum, London, 2014, illustrated on the
                                                          catalogue cover and as ! g. 64 (! g. 1).

                                                          On both jars a six-character Xuande reign mark is inscribed on the neck, in a
                                                          style very similar to the mark on the present box, in addition to the characters
                                                          Yuyongjian zao, ‘Made by the Directorate for Imperial Accouterments’. This
                                                          o$  ce, which undoubtedly was responsible also for the production of our box,
                                                          was, according to Charles O. Hucker, A Dictionary of O"  cial Titles in Imperial
                                                          China, Stanford, 1985, p. 595, no. 8213, “one of 12 major Directorates …
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100