Page 525 - The Golden Age of Chinese Archaeology: Celebrated Discoveries from the People’s Republic of China
P. 525

mainly in northern  China, and  we have evidence that copper  dominated  the  metallurgy of
                           cultures that  were contemporaneous with the  Xia dynasty. No copper  object  dating prior to  the
                           Xia dynasty has been found to date in the  lower Yangzi region. Among the  Erlitou culture — the
                           most advanced of its contemporary cultures in metalworking — bronzes constitute  83 percent
                           of metal objects.  Bronzes similarly dominate  metal objects  unearthed  from  a burial  site of  the
                           Siba culture  at Huoshaoguo  (71.8 percent); by contrast,  copper  dominates the  metal  objects
                           excavated  from  another burial  site  of the  Siba culture—at Donghuishan,  Minghe. Cultural  con-
                           tacts  between  China and the  West began during the Xia period, but  copper  objects  were made
                           and  used  in China  more than  1000  years prior; the  transition  to the  Bronze Age in China was
                           in  fact  fully  realized in the  second  millennium BCE. These data  indicate that copper  and  bronze
                           metallurgy in China were indigenous inventions, and  there  is evidence as well that many an-
                           cient  cultures in China developed  copper  metallurgy and made the  transition  from  copper  to
                           bronze independent  of one  another.
                                We have evidence that  villages were a form  of social organization as early as the  Laoguan-
                           tai culture  (c. 6000  BCE). Data regarding  social organization prior to the  Laoguantai period  are

                           sparse, and  we know little about  the  structure  of small settlements  or about  how villages came
                           into  being. We know that  around 6000  BCE, clans were the  predominant  form  of social organi-
                           zation; kinship and  property  were transmitted  matrilineally. A thousand  years later  (c. 5000
                           BCE), we find society organized in three  levels: household, clan, and  tribe; households  were ma-
                           trilineal and  functioned relatively independently of the  clan. By the  time of the  Xiyin  culture
                           (c. 4000  BCE), the  matrilineal system of household  organization and  transmission of  property
                           had  been  replaced  by a patrilineal system, a system that characterizes Phase IV of the  Banpo
                           culture  (c. 3200  BCE) and  finds  its  full  expression around 2200  BCE with the  appearance  of
                           polygamous burials.
                                The identification of the  origins of "Chinese civilization"  have been  a hotly debated  mat-
                           ter  since the  mid-KjSos.  Early China was characterized  by two distinct  patterns  of social  and
                           economic  organization, one based  on agriculture and the  other on herding.  Herding was con-
                           centrated in the  region  currently  defined by the  Great Wall; to the  west, herding  developed  out
                           of agriculture, while to the  east  it developed  out  of a hunting and  gathering  economy. The
                           herding  civilization did not  develop  until the  Xia period  (and is thus  outside the  scope of this
                           article). What follows concentrates  on  "agricultural civilization."
                                Elements of civilization necessarily predate the  formation of civilization itself.  Scholars
                           generally agree  on two points: that  Chinese civilization can be traced  back to  several points of

                           origin that  followed  parallel lines of development, with contacts  and  mutual influences; and
                           that different  cultures developed at different  rates. Increasingly scholars have identified the
                           study of the  origins and  formation of civilization with guozhi dashi  zai siyu  rong ("ritual and  war
                           are the  most important  business of the  state"), rather  than  simply characterizing early civiliza-
                           tion  as a society founded on  slavery. Though situating the  formation of civilization in time



                           524  |  ZHAN G  Z H O N C P E I
   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530