Page 33 - JAPAN THE SHAPING OFDAIMYO CULTURE 1185-1868
P. 33

The  medieval  Hosokawa   reached  their  peak  of  political  power
                                       under  Hosokawa Masamoto    (1466-1507)  who  as Kanrei  treated  the  elev-
                                       enth Ashikaga shogun  as a nonentity  and  virtually  ruled  the  country  on
                                       his own. Like their  rivals the  Ouchi, the  Hosokawa were active in trade
                                       with China  and  Korea and  sponsored  merchants  from  the  port  of Sakai.
                                       Like  many  other  shugo  daimyo  the  Hosokawa  were  also  patrons  and
                                       practitioners  of  the  arts.  Yoriharu and  Yoriyuki  were  both  regarded  as
                                       fine  poets  and  had  their  verses included  in  a  number  of court  antholo-
                                       gies. Yoriyuki studied Zen  with one  of the  most influential  Rinzai monks
                                       of  the  fourteenth  century, Muso _Soseki. Hosokawa Katsumoto, who led
                                       one of the warrior leagues in the  Onin War, frequently held  renga and tea
                                       gatherings. He too was an enthusiastic patron  of Zen  and established  the
                                       Ryôanji,  a  Zen  temple  in  Kyoto,  with  its  magnificent  dry  landscape
                                       garden.  Hosokawa  Shigeyuki, shugo  of  Awa, had  multifaceted  cultural
                                       interests. In addition to renga and  waka he  was proficient in painting and
                                       kickball  (kemari),  and  a  patron  of  No.  Divided  by  a  bitter  succession
                                       dispute after  Katsumoto's death,  the  main branch  of the  medieval Hoso-
                                       kawa  daimyo family  declined  after  the  Onin  War. The  family  fortunes
                                       were revived in the  sixteenth  century by Hosokawa Yüsai (Fujitaka,  1534-
                                       1610) and  Sansai (Tadaoki, 1563-1646), members  of a branch  family. Yüsai
                                       and Sansai were among the  survivors in the cut and thrust of the military
                                       campaigns  of  the  sixteenth  century.  They  were  also  among  the  most
                                       cultured  of  the  daimyo who  showed  an  interest  in  the  way of  bun. We
                                       will look at them  in a little more  detail when  we come to  consider  some
                                       of  their  peers  as  daimyo  in  the  late  sixteenth  and  early  seventeenth
                                       centuries.  Other daimyo who practiced  the  twofold path  of literary and
                                       martial  arts  in  this  period  were  the  Hatakeyama,  Asakura,  Takeda,
                                       Uesugi,  and  Hôjô.  Hôjô  Ujiyasu,  for  instance,  was  a  vigorous patron  of
                                       scholarship who supported  the  Ashikaga school  for samurai, the  nearest
                                       medieval  Japan  came  to  having  a  university. According  to  Francisco
                                       Xavier  it  was the  largest  school  in  Japan in  the  sixteenth  century,  with
                                       more than three thousand  students.


                                       The  daimyo       Sporadic  provincial warfare  in  the  late  fifteenth  and
                                       in  an age  of    early sixteenth  centuries  gave way after  1560 to large-
                                       war and           scale  campaigns  by  Oda  Nobunaga,  Toyotomi  Hide-
                                       unification       yoshi,  and  Tokugawa leyasu.  All aimed  at  reunifying
                                                         the  country. The  escalating pace and  scale of warfare
                                                         brought  greater  unpredictability  and  change  to  dai-
                                       myo.  The  process  of  unification  demanded  the  reduction  of  daimyo
                                       autonomy.  A weakening of the  domain  or  a mistake in  choosing  an  ally
                                       could  lead  to destruction  in a single battle.  A few families,  including  the
                                       Shimazu  of  Satsuma, survived all the  warfare  and  continued  as daimyo
                                       until  the  nineteenth  century.  Most  of the  medieval shugo daimyo, how-
                                       ever,  were  overthrown.  In  some  cases  the  smaller  daimyo houses  with
                                       more  closely controlled  domains who replaced them in the  late fifteenth
                                       and  sixteenth  centuries  were  able  to  consolidate  their  positions and  ally
                                       themselves  with  one  of  the  unifiers to  survive and  flourish  in  the  late
                                       sixteenth and early seventeenth  centuries. In many cases, however, those
                                       daimyo who toppled  shugo were crushed  in their turn when they stood in
                                       the  way of unification. In many parts of the  country three or four daimyo
                                       families  achieved  local  hegemony  and  lost  it  again  in  the  course  of  the
                                       sixteenth century. This period of intense  social upheaval is known as  the
                                       age ofgekokujô,  "inferiors toppling superiors/'
                                              Underlying these almost bewildering surface phenomena   ofgeko-
                                       kujô  were significant changes  in the  institutional character  of daimyo. In
                                       the  crucible  of warfare  and  unification new  types of daimyo were being



   20
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38